ADSM-L

Re: adsm tape device problem on Windows NT

2015-10-04 17:40:32
Subject: Re: adsm tape device problem on Windows NT
From: Leonid Sirotinsky <lsirotinsky AT IAA.GOV DOT IL>
To: <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> Dear Burak.
>
> I think that you can't change the situation.
> I'd like to send you the following explanation.
>
> >From IBM's Manual:
>
> How ADSM Uses Sequential Access Devices.
>
> 4.  Dismounts the volume from the drive when it has finished accessing the
> volume.
>
>         If the library is manually operated, the server simply ejects the
> volume from the drive so that a mount operator can place it in an
> appropriate
>         storage location.
>
>         If the library is user-defined, the server ejects the volume from
> the drive and invokes the dismount exit program. The dismount exit program
> can
>         perform any cleanup tasks required by the media management system.
>
>         If the library is automated, the server utilizes appropriate
OS/400
> commands to move the volume from the drive back to its original storage
slot
> in
>         the library.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Leonid.
> Leonid Sirotinsky
> > AS/400 Systems Administrator
> > Israel Airports Authority
> > Ben-Gurion Airport
> >       http://www.ben-gurion-airport.co.il
> >
> >       Tel : 972-3-9710172
> >       Mobil: 972-53-204-257
> >       Email : lsirotinsky AT iaa.gov DOT il
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Burak Demircan [SMTP:burak.demircan AT MBTURK.MERCEDES-BENZ DOT COM]
> > Sent: 04 August 1999 14:25
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      adsm tape device problem on Windows NT
> >
> > Hello,
> > Is there anybody who knows why tape device
> > ejects the tape on a Windows NT ADSM server with
> > only one tape driver? somebody told that it is
> > relevant with the server options but how?
> >
> > thank you very much
> >
> >
>
> ***** Disclaimer *****
> This file has been scanned for viruses.
> Any files attached and opened by you are at your own risk !! Remember, the
> Israel Airports Authority is NOT responsible for any damage or destruction
> caused by files sent to you and opened.
> For information regarding scanning files attached to this email, contact
2772.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>