ADSM-L

Re: "Full" backup suggestions

2015-10-04 17:41:27
Subject: Re: "Full" backup suggestions
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Do NOT try to do this by activating a new policy set.
A given file cannot be bound to more than one management class at a time.
If you change the management class parameters, then run a backup, all the
affected files are REBOUND to the new management class, and immediately take
on the new management class rules.
Expiration of files will occur according to the current management class,
thereby wrecking the backup scheme you intended for your regular incremental
backups.

Using archives instead of copy pool tapes is the only way to do what you
want.

(Insert here the usual lecture to your "powers that be" about the
shortsightedness of being stingy on the media budget, the tiny cost of media
vs. cost of lost data/lost business, etc.)

Good luck, you''ll need it!

************************************************************************
Wanda Prather
The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Lab
443-778-8769
wanda_prather AT jhuapl DOT edu

"Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think" -
Scott Adams/Dilbert
************************************************************************




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weeks, Debbie [SMTP:debbie AT ADMIN.USF DOT EDU]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 1:32 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      "Full" backup suggestions
>
> We initially implemented ADSM w/DRM employing the incremental ideology.
> However, the cost of having a full duplicate set of tapes offsite for data
> that is retained forever (in some cases) has become a strain on the
> storage
> media budget.  The powers that be have requested (actually, it was a bit
> stronger than a request) that I change our backup plan so that only the
> most
> recent "full" backups are backed up to copy pool tapes and sent offsite
> for
> DR.  We plan to continue our regular incremental backups for normal
> recovery, with the existing retention parameters, so the "full" backups
> will
> only be retained for 14 days.
>
> I know that I have seen others interested in alternatives to the complete
> duplication of the incremental storage pool for offsite DR planning.  I
> have
> considered two plans of attack.  One is to activate a different policy set
> prior to running full backups (the backup window could get to be a problem
> here), and the other would be to employ archive functions (difficult to
> use
> on all platforms).  Could I please get some suggestions from this group on
> implementation of a new plan?  Any suggestions/experiences would be
> appreciated.
>
>
> BACKGROUND INFO
>
> We currently run ADSM on a 3466 (AIX), and use it to backup SUN, UNIX, and
> NT servers.  We also have connect agents that backup SQL Server databases,
> Exchange databases, and SQL Backtrack for Oracle databases.  We currently
> have 5 policy domains, 1 for collocation, 1 for Exchange databases, 1 for
> SQL Server, 1 for non-collocation, and 1 for Exchange servers.  We
> currently
> have archives that run on a monthly basis on select NT servers that are
> retained for one year.
>
> Debbie Weeks
> University of South Florida
> Information Technologies/Technical Support
> *********
> *Debbie AT admin.usf DOT edu
> *(813) 974-6926   *  S/C 574-6926
> Fax(813) 974-3054
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>