Well, 3.1.0.7 seems to have introduced another bug into the adsm scheduler
on Windows.
We won't be installing this client, either.

HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO ASK FOR QUALITY CONTROL FOR EXISTING ADSM
FUNCTIONS WHEN NEW CLIENTS ARE RELEASED?

The scheduler output was damaged in 3.1.0.1 and we complained about that,
and were assured MANY TIMES that ADSM was REALLY introducing quality control
procedures.

Well?

It's quite obvious that, once again, NOBODY LOOKED AT THE OUTPUT of the most
basic, long-standing ADSM functions before releasing this client.

What's the excuse this time?

My opinions and nobody else's,

Wanda Prather





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF. [SMTP:Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 8:44 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: 3.1.0.7 Windows client.
>
> Hello,
> as many of us, we are still waiting for a stabilized version of the Win32
> client code. Running 3.1.0.3 for the moment. We had great hope to install
> 3.1.0.7 but....
>
> Regards,
>
> Rene Lambelet
> Nestec SA - 55, Av. Nestle - CH-1800 Vevey
> Tel: ++41'21'924'35'43 / Fax: ++41'21'924'45'89
> E-Mail: rene.lambelet AT nestle DOT com
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian L. Nick [SMTP:BRIAN_NICK AT PHL DOT COM]
> > Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 1:59 PM
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      3.1.0.7 Windows client.
> >
> > Good morning all,
> >
> >    Back on June 11th I sent a note to the list to see if anyone ws
> running
> > the
> > 3..0.7 client for NT and if so if they had trouble with the SCHEDLOG or
> > the
> > ERRORLOG. I have since opened a problem with IBM and APAR IC24236 has
> been
> > created.If you are planning on running 3.1.0.7 for windows I would
> suggest
> > that
> > you look at this APAR first.
> >
> >
> >                               Good Luck
> >                                   Brian