ADSM-L

Re: Another server crash

1999-06-22 07:53:07
Subject: Re: Another server crash
From: Lauer Edouard <Edouard.Lauer AT BIL-DEXIA DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:53:07 +0200
Hi,

just I can say is to open a PMR for it to IBM. We also had several server
crashes in version 3.1.2.20 on AIX 4.2.1 and we opened a PMR for it.
Apparently
what is happening now is that IBM says we should wait 3.1.2.30 coming out.
It
would be good that every person having a problem with version 3.1.2.20 opens

a PMR to IBM so that they work more actively on every issue.

Regards,
_________________ Lauer Edouard ____________________
______ Prod. informatique ____ Systèmes Ouverts ________
__ * +352 4590 3889 __ * Edouard.Lauer AT bil-dexia DOT com __


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dirk Kastens [SMTP:Dirk.Kastens AT RZ.UNI-OSNABRUECK DOT DE]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 1999 1:28 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Another server crash
> 
> Hi,
> 
> our ADSM server (3.1.2.20, AIX 4.2.1) just crashed with lots of the
> following messages in the activity log:
> 
> ANR9999D pkshmem.c(309): Invalid attempt to free memory;
>                        called from 1042A2B4 (tcpSendSSL).
> 
> I was just defining new volumes to the tape stgpools using the
> web administrative interface with HTTPS.
> I also discovered that the server started using a huge amount of
> cpu time a few days ago. The average cpu load was 30% user and
> 70% system time. The dsmserv process took more than 9100 cpu
> minutes. After the restart everything seems to be fine again.
> The cpu load decreased to 4% user, 3% system, and 6% wait.
> 
> Is this a known error and is there a fix available or shall I open
> a PMR with IBM?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dirk Kastens _______________Dirk.Kastens AT uos DOT de
> Universitaet Osnabrueck       Phone: +49/541/969-2347 (work)
> Rechenzentrum               Fax:   +49/541/969-2470 (work)
> Albrechtstr. 28
> D-49069 Osnabrueck
> Germany
> 
> ==============================================================
> 
> An electronic message is not binding on its sender.  
> Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing
> and duly signed.
> 
> ==============================================================
> 

=============================================================
An electronic message is not binding on its sender.
Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing and 
duly signed.

============================================================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>