Julie and/or Kuli,
I missed the response to WHY level 20 of the MVS server was backed
off. I'm getting ready to move to 3.1.2.20 this month - was there some
problem?
Ginny
---------------------- Forwarded by Virginia L Hysock/HI/CSC on 06/10/99
10:13 AM ---------------------------
10:13 AM ---------------------------
(Embedded image moved to file: PIC24827.PCX)
Virginia L Hysock/HI/CSC
06/10/99 10:09 AM
To: Virginia L Hysock/GIS/CSC@CSC
cc:
Subject:
When you backed out the v 3.1.2.20 did you also back out the database to a
previous backup?, this might explain why you have volumes assigned to ADSM
by your tape management system that ADSM does not know about.
How much activity was there on the server from when you you upgraded to
when
you backed out?.
What level of MVS are you on?
What was the reason to back out the upgrade?.
Thanks,
Kuli.
Kulbinder Toora
01384 296191 x3498
e-mail - Kulbinder.toora AT meb.co DOT uk
Midlands Electricity
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julie Phinney [SMTP:jphinney AT HUMANA DOT COM]
> Sent: Saturday, June 05, 1999 3:39 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: ADSM for MVS and CA-1
>
> Hi,
> I have specified the tape deletion exit, and ADSM has worked fine with
> CA-1
> for years at our site... until now. Has anyone seen a bug with that tape
> deletion exit where in some cases it doesn't work?
> I did briefly upgrade to 3.1.2.20, but had to back off to 3.1.2.14.
> Would
> upgrading, then going back, some how cause a problem with the tape
> deletion
> exit?
> Thanks,
> Julie
>
|
