ADSM-L

[no subject]

2015-10-04 17:46:05
Hi Henk,
 
I have observed reclamation of our copypool volumes and once ADSM has reclaimed the data of these volumes they return to the scratch pool.
 
Can you check volume U00020 with q volume f=d and compare it with this example?
 
             Volume Name: WPDV00                                   ¦
¦              Storage Pool Name: TAPEPOOL                                 ¦
¦              Device Class Name: TAPE                                     ¦
¦        Estimated Capacity (MB): 5.8                                      ¦
¦                       Pct Util: 0.1                                      ¦
¦                  Volume Status: On-line                                  ¦
¦                         Access: Read/Write                               ¦
¦         Pct. Reclaimable Space: 3.2                                      ¦
¦                Scratch Volume?: Yes                                      ¦
¦                In Error State?: No                                       ¦
¦       Number of Writable Sides: 1                                        ¦
¦        Number of Times Mounted: 11                                       ¦
¦              Write Pass Number: 1                                        ¦
¦      Approx. Date Last Written: 04/14/1995 16:17:26                      ¦
¦         Approx. Date Last Read: 04/01/1995 13:26:18                      ¦
¦            Date Became Pending:                                          ¦
¦         Number of Write Errors: 0                                        ¦
¦          Number of Read Errors: 0                                        ¦
¦                Volume Location:                                          ¦
¦ Last Update by (administrator): COLLIN                                   ¦
¦          Last Update Date/Time: 05/01/1995 14:07:27                      ¦
¦                                                          
all our volumes have scratch volume?:yes and they do exactly what you described.
I don't think that there is anything to worry about.
 
Cheers
 
 

 
>I think a have a serious problem. Well, actually I don't think so, but
>I'am sure.
>
>A volume (U00020) is defined to a storagepool (UNITEPOOL) and is
>used for backup's. After a while, Space reclamation started for this
>volume:
>
>03/29/99   09:33:53  ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume U00020,
>                      storage pool UNITEPOOL (process number 597).
>03/29/99   09:33:53  ANR1044I Removable volume U00020 is required for space
>                      reclamation.
>03/29/99   09:33:53  ANR8324I 3590 volume U00020 is expected to be mounted
>                      (R/O).
>03/29/99   09:33:53  ANR1142I Moving data for collocation cluster 1 of 1 on
>                      volume U00020.
>03/29/99   12:28:20  ANR1175W Volume U00020 contains files which could not be
>                      reclaimed.
>03/29/99   12:28:20  ANR1410W Access mode for volume U00020 now set to
>                      "unavailable".
>03/29/99   12:28:20  ANR1041I Space reclamation ended for volume U00020.
>
>Well, after the space reclamation ended and the volume is set to "unavailable",
>it is disappeared from the storagepool:
>
>adsm> q vol U*
>....
>U00018                    UNITEPOOL    3494-3590         0.0    0.0  Pending
>U00019                    UNITEPOOL    3494-3590         0.0    0.0  Pending
>U00021                    UNITEPOOL    3494-3590    14,920.0   68.1    Full
>U00022                    UNITEPOOL    3494-3590         0.0    0.0  Pending
>....
>
>Every morning at 09:00, a backup db started, which should use only
>scratch volumes. Well, at least, this is the way it works for a long
>time :-(
>
>SURPRISE:
>Private volume U00020 is used:
>
>03/30/99   09:00:24  ANR2750I Starting scheduled command BACKUP_DB ( backup db
>                      devclass=3494-3590 type=full ).
>03/30/99   09:00:24  ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: BACKUP DB
>                      devclass=3494-3590 type=full
>03/30/99   09:00:24  ANR0984I Process 628 for DATABASE BACKUP started in the
>                      BACKGROUND at 09:00:24.
>03/30/99   09:00:24  ANR2280I Full database backup started as process 628.
>03/30/99   09:00:24  ANR2280I Full database backup started as process 628.
>03/30/99   09:00:24  ANR2753I (BACKUP_DB):ANR2280I Full database backup started
>                      as
>03/30/99   09:00:24  ANR2753I (BACKUP_DB):process 628.
>03/30/99   09:00:24  ANR2756I Scheduled command BACKUP_DB started successfully.
>03/30/99   09:01:05  ANR8337I 3590 volume U00020 mounted in drive 3590-2
>                      (/dev/rmt2).
>03/30/99   09:01:07  ANR1360I Output volume U00020 opened (sequence number 1).
>.....
>.....
>03/30/99   09:52:40  ANR4554I Backed up 2292528 of 2326863 database pages.
>03/30/99   09:53:10  ANR4554I Backed up 2316736 of 2326863 database pages.
>03/30/99   09:53:31  ANR1361I Output volume U00020 closed.
>03/30/99   09:53:33  ANR8336I Verifying label of 3590 volume U00020 in drive
>                      3590-2 (/dev/rmt2).
>03/30/99   09:53:36  ANR4550I Full database backup (process 628) complete,
>                      2326863 pages copied.
>03/30/99   09:53:36  ANR0985I Process 628 for DATABASE BACKUP running in the
>                      BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS at
>                      09:53:36.
>03/30/99   09:54:02  ANR8468I 3590 volume U00020 dismounted from drive 3590-2
>                      (/dev/rmt2) in library 3494LIB.
>
>And volume U00020 suddenly appear in the libvol as Private/DbBackup:
>
>adsm> q libvol * U*
>3494LIB         U00018         Private              Data
>3494LIB         U00019         Private              Data
>3494LIB         U00020         Private              DbBackup
>3494LIB         U00021         Private              Data
>3494LIB         U00022         Private              Data
>
>So, the backup-data from volume U00020 is gone for ever.
>
>And this is not the only volume which is destroyed this way.
>
>Questions:
>
>1. Why are the volumes disappear from the storagepool?
>2. Why is backup db using private volumes?
>
>Anyone any clues?
>
>Cheers,
>Henk ten Have ( ADSM Server 3.1.2.15 on AIX 4.2.1.0) ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01BE7BB7.08026980-- =======================================================================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [no subject], Unknown <=