ADSM-L

Re (Rescued Mail)

1999-03-12 17:22:27
Subject: Re (Rescued Mail)
From: Harry Cantrell <Harry.Cantrell AT KMC-USA DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:22:27 -0800
---------------------- Forwarded by Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa on 03/12/99 02:18 PM 
---------------------------   Mike Soursby 03/11/99 11:37 AM  To:   ADSM-L AT 
VM.MARIST DOT EDU cc:   Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa  Subject:  Re: ADSM 3.1.2.0 & 
OS390 r5  (Document link not converted)  We're just now getting into it, but 
we're on OS/390 2.6, and haven't had any problems SO FAR. Could it be your 
ICS/IPS setting on MVS?  Are you using workload manager? Could it be a TCP/IP 
setting problem?  Those are some places to start. Sorry if this isn't enough 
help.    Harry Cantrell 03/11/99 10:46 AM  To:   Mike Soursby/Kmc-Usa cc: 
Subject:  ADSM 3.1.2.0 & OS390 r5  FYI ---------------------- Forwarded by 
Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa on 03/11/99 10:42 AM ---------------------------   David 
Ehresman <deehre01 AT ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE DOT EDU> on 03/06/99 10:58:58 AM  
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>  To:  
 ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU cc:    (bcc: Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa)  Subject:  
ADSM 3.1.2.0 & O
 S!
 S!
390 r5     We are running an ADSM 3.1.2.0 server on OS390. We have been 
successfully running on OS390 R3 and have been testing on OS390 R5. The testing 
went ok but when we moved OS390 R5 into production last night, ADSM has been 
having problems.  ADSM has been running at about 75% of a processor and 
responds very sluggishly or not at all to commands entered from the OS390 
console. It does not appear to be doing any productive works.  I don't know if 
it is related, but we also got a number of ANR2579E messages shortly after 
startup indicating schedules failing with return code 1.  Is anyone running 
ADSM on OS390 R5? At what ADSM maintenance level? Any ideas?  David
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>