Dwight,
Thanks for the reply! I checked the accounting records and it appears that
there
are only 3 entries for when the sesions for my PC ended (usually after timing
out).
There doesn't seem to be any entry for when the archive started or ended. I
could be
wrong because I've never looked at the accounting records before, but for each
entry, there is a corresponding entry in the activity log that says "Session
terminated - idle for more than 15 minutes"
This following is what was displayed 63 times in the activity log:
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4952I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Total number of
objects inspected: 248
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4953I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Total number of
objects archived: 248
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4958I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Total number of
objects updated: 0
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4960I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Total number of
objects rebound: 0
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4957I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Total number of
objects deleted: 0
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4959I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Total number of
objects failed: 0
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4961I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Total number of
bytes transferred: 13.45 MB
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4963I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Data transfer
time: 281.53 sec
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4966I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Network data
transfer rate: 722.12 KB/sec
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4967I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Aggregate data
transfer rate: 281.53 KB/sec
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4968I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Objects
compressed by: 37%
03/17/99 14:13:51 ANE4964I (Sessio: 1487, Nod: ASLESINGER) Elapsed
processing time: 00:00:48
The processing time, number of objects inspected, and number of bytes
transferred
kept changing though. You know what? I just noticed that the three things I
just
mentioned all increased with each set of statistics. For example the number of
bytes transferred was 458B, 4.65KB, 21.90KB, 22.43KB, 29.45KB ... 87.04 MB.
Why
would it do something like this? I wonder if this has happened to anyone else?
If i could ask one more question: Where do I go to find out what the lables for
the
fields are in the accounting records?
thanks!
adam
Dwight Cook wrote:
> OK... were there 63 "begin" and "end" sessions ? ? ?
> what exactly were you counting to get 63 ? ? ? (accounting record
> entries? ? ?)
>
> You have spotted why you want to try to keep a single adsm volume on a
> single physical device ! (no really, good deal) ADSM ends up
> treating all its "defined volumes" kind'a like a RAID array. Inbound
> data is spread out across the disks... Ever wondered why a MOVE DATA
> against a 4 GB disk volume ends up moving 20 GB to tape ? ? ?
>
> Also note... if you look at the accounting records for an archive
> session that pushes only a single file, you will see 2 archive
> objects. One is the file itself and the other is the directory
> information (for the directory where the file resides...)
>
> later,
> Dwight
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
> _________________________________
> Subject: Files Archived Twice - why?
> Author: aslesinger (aslesinger AT US.BNSMC DOT COM) at unix,mime
> Date: 3/17/99 2:48 PM
>
> Hello everybody. First of all, I've got to say that I love this list!
> I've been able to resolve two other problems with the responses that
> I've gotten. Well, what do you think of this one?
>
> I'm setting up our ability to archive with ADSM for Month-End. I've
> defined four volumes (dsm.arch1, dsm.arch2, dsm.arch3, and dsm.arch4)
> to the storage pool ARCHIVEPOOL which is disk. I kicked off an archive
> of 4 directories and several sub directories on my PC (WIN95 - v3r1
> level 0.1) as a test.
>
> Normally after a backup or archive finishes, the statistics are sent
> from the client to the activity log on the server. Well, when I checked
> the activity log, there was 63 sets of statistics from that archive! It
> looked as though it did 63 archives. That's my first question: Why did
> it do that?
>
> The archived data was spread out on 3 of the disk volumes and so I did a
> 'Q CONTENT' on each one. After inspecting the output, I noticed that
> about 50 files (the majority from one directory) were stored in one one
> volume *and* also in another volume. That's my second question: Why did
> it archive these files more than once, in two different places?
>
> My environment: ADSM Server 3.1.1.5 on AIX 4.2.1 ADSM Client 3.1.0.5
> on WIN95
>
> Thanks for any help with this!!!
> adam
> __________________
> Adam Slesinger
> Corporate Information Systems
> Brown & Sharpe, RI
> Phone: (401) 886-2236
> Email: aslesinger AT us.bnsmc DOT com
|
