ADSM-L

Re: ADSM 3.1.2.0 & OS390 r5

1999-03-12 17:22:27
Subject: Re: ADSM 3.1.2.0 & OS390 r5
From: Harry Cantrell <Harry.Cantrell AT KMC-USA DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:22:27 -0800
---------------------- Forwarded by Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa on 03/12/99
02:18 PM ---------------------------
02:18 PM ---------------------------


Mike Soursby
03/11/99 11:37 AM

To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:   Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa

Subject:  Re: ADSM 3.1.2.0 & OS390 r5  (Document link not converted)

We're just now getting into it, but we're on OS/390 2.6, and haven't had
any problems SO FAR.
Could it be your ICS/IPS setting on MVS?  Are you using workload manager?
Could it be a TCP/IP setting problem?  Those are some places to start.
Sorry if this isn't enough help.



Harry Cantrell
03/11/99 10:46 AM

To:   Mike Soursby/Kmc-Usa
cc:
Subject:  ADSM 3.1.2.0 & OS390 r5

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa on 03/11/99
10:42 AM ---------------------------
10:42 AM ---------------------------


David Ehresman <deehre01 AT ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE DOT EDU> on 03/06/99 10:58:58 AM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>

To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa)

Subject:  ADSM 3.1.2.0 & OS390 r5




We are running an ADSM 3.1.2.0 server on OS390. We have been successfully
running on OS390 R3 and have been testing on OS390 R5. The testing
went ok but when we moved OS390 R5 into production last night,
ADSM has been having problems.

ADSM has been running at about 75% of a processor and responds very
sluggishly or not at all to commands entered from the OS390
console. It does not appear to be doing any productive works.

I don't know if it is related, but we also got a number of
ANR2579E messages shortly after startup indicating schedules
failing with return code 1.

Is anyone running ADSM on OS390 R5? At what ADSM maintenance level?
Any ideas?

David
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>