I second your request to IBM...

Cyndee  Groves
Sprint  - Network Systems Services
Systems Management



   -----Original Message-----
   From:       KauffmanT [SMTP:KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM]
   Sent:       Monday, February 22, 1999 8:09 AM
   To:         ADSM-L
   Cc:         KauffmanT
   Subject:    Re: Audit db......it's completed

   Absolutely *wonderful* . . .

   I don't care how bad the database corruption gets - my maximum
   permitted
   down time is 16 hours, and I only get that on one day a week. If this
   process cannot be made restartable, my only recourse would be to
   start a new
   server with an empty database and start exporting data from the
   current one.

   IBM, how about giving us a real database that we can use standard
   recovery
   tools against?

   Tom Kauffman
   Sr. Technical Analyst
   NIBCO, Inc.

   > -----Original Message-----
   > From: Riccardo Corona [SMTP:rcorona AT ESOC.ESA DOT DE]
   > Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 3:08 AM
   > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
   > Subject:      Re: Audit db......it's completed
   >
   > Great ! Only  six ( 6 !! ) days to audit the db with fix=yes.
   > Ok  it's not a very powerful server but according  to ibm statement
   ( db
   > size type of machine and so on ) the  process was supposed to  run
   for two
   > or three days.
   > And also the log file is empty. Just luck I had a very long buffer
   window
   > and I could go back and see the whole story.
   > I agree with John's  method  using  > logfile instead of
   LOGFILE=.....
   > Thanks to everybody
   > Riccardo
    << File: Re_ Audit db......HTM >>


--openmail-part-0cad4545-00000001--
=========================================================================