should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?
1999-02-01 10:41:36
Subject: |
should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries? |
From: |
Odd Magne Sekkingstad <oddmagne AT NO.IBM DOT COM> |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:41:36 +0000 |
Status Distribution January 31, 1999 15:39:36
The message regarding "should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?"
sent on January 31, 1999 15:39:36 was sent by
Status Recipient
Type To
Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Foreign Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU\n\n\nINTERNET
Recipients
Status Reporters
Type From
Initials OM
Name Domain NOTES
Native Name CN=Odd Magne Sekkingstad/OU=Norway/O=IBM@IBMNO
Foreign Native Name CN=Odd Magne
Sekkingstad/OU=Norway/O=IBM\nIBMNO\n\n
Organization IBM
Org Unit 1 Norway
Last Name Sekkingstad
First Name Odd
Status 769
Explanation Invalid recipient
X.400 Status 769
Explanation Router: Unable to open mailbox file D17HUBM3/17/H/IBM mail.box:
Server not responding
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- should I define two standalone 3590s as two libraries?,
Odd Magne Sekkingstad <=
|
|
|