Re: %Util vs %Migr
1998-12-18 08:39:46
Sorry - I forgot to mention that we turned caching off. That's why we
expected to see %UTIL and %MIGR figures to be about the same most of the
time. Any other thoughts?
ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu on 12/17/98 03:29:06 PM
Please respond to ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu @ INTERNET
To: ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject: Re: %Util vs %Migr
Betsy--If I remember correctly if you are caching on your disk storage
pool, the cached files will show up in the %UTIL column. They are
taking up space, but would not be migrated.
Jim Bohnsack
Raytheon Systems Co.
> ----------
> From: Moir,Betsy[SMTP:betsy.moir AT ABBOTT DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 1998 3:00 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: %Util vs %Migr
>
> My ADSM VM server support person and I have been tracking our disk
> stgpool
> volume usage for the last week or so. The figures we are seeing
> regularly
> are %UTIL is consistently about 32% higher than %Migr (37% Util vs.
> 5%
> Migr). We run with thresholds of 90% and 70% from 5am until 9pm at
> which
> time they drop down to 10% and 5% to encourage migration. We are
> concerned
> that the %Util figures and %Migr figures do not run generally about
> the
> same. We are currently running an audit volume on each of our volumes
> to see
> if there is any damage on any of the volumes that might be causing
> this
> discrepancy. All volumes are varied online.
>
> Any suggestions or thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated.
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- %Util vs %Migr, Moir,Betsy
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Bohnsack, JA Jim (6030)
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, buser andreas
- Re: %Util vs %Migr,
Moir,Betsy <=
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Bill Colwell
- Re[2]: %Util vs %Migr, James SPORER
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Moir,Betsy
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Joel Fuhrman
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Bill Colwell
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Richard Sims
- Re: %Util vs %Migr, Kampa, Ray (MCI)
|
|
|