ADSM-L

Re: Tape drive contention

2015-10-04 17:50:04
Subject: Re: Tape drive contention
From: Dwight Cook [SMTP:decook AT AMOCO DOT COM]
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
     5. adsm process goes into a wait state, waiting on mount point in
     device class blah...


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Tape drive contention
Author:  Thomas.Denier (Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU) at unix,mime
Date:    12/16/98 9:16 AM


What would happen in the event of a situation like the following:
1.An OS/390 system has 2 3590 drives
2.An ADSM server on the system has a device class for 3590 drives with
a
  MOUNTLIMIT of 2
3.Batch jobs unrelated to ADSM start using both 3590 drives
4.ADSM starts a process that requires a 3590 drive
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>