|
Re: Tape drive contention
1998-12-16 11:26:37
|
Subject: |
Re: Tape drive contention |
|
From: |
Dwight Cook <decook AT AMOCO DOT COM> |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:26:37 -0600 |
5. adsm process goes into a wait state, waiting on mount point in
device class blah...
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Tape drive contention
Author: Thomas.Denier (Thomas.Denier AT MAIL.TJU DOT EDU) at unix,mime
Date: 12/16/98 9:16 AM
What would happen in the event of a situation like the following:
1.An OS/390 system has 2 3590 drives
2.An ADSM server on the system has a device class for 3590 drives with a
MOUNTLIMIT of 2
3.Batch jobs unrelated to ADSM start using both 3590 drives
4.ADSM starts a process that requires a 3590 drive
|
|
|
