Update:

in the server optset, we have "domain c:" hard coded!

It means the double scan is logical with "domain \\uncname\c$" coded in the
dsm.opt!

Nevertheless, with no coding of domain in the dsm.opt, we should not get a
backup of \\uncname\c$ !!


rl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
> Sent: Friday, 11. December 1998 15:09
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      RE: Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!
>
> ok. With no domain coded or with "domain \\uncname\c$" coded in the
> dsm.opt, we get double scanning of every file, once for the uncname, then
> once more for the C:
>
> The only way to get normal scanning is to code "domain C:" in the dsm.opt.
>
> I think that double scan should be avoided in every case!
>
> Regards,
>
> Rene Lambelet
> Nestec SA - 55, Av. Nestle - CH-1800 Vevey
> Tel: ++41'21'924'35'43 / Fax: ++41'21'924'45'89
> E-Mail: rene.lambelet AT nestle DOT com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbs AT bu DOT edu [SMTP:rbs AT bu DOT edu]
> Sent: Friday, 11. December 1998 14:20
> To:   Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
> Subject:      Client 3.1.0.6, files got inspected 2 times!!
>
> Rene - You didn't tell us what was in your options for Domain, but in
>        any case, the ADSM behavior you report doesn't sound right.
> Try playing with your options when you run simply 'dsmc i' and try
> to isolate when the doubling occurs.         Richard Sims, BU