ADSM-L

Re: ADSM and 3390-6 - File size limits in OS/390??

1998-11-16 04:44:00
Subject: Re: ADSM and 3390-6 - File size limits in OS/390??
From: Christo Heuer <christoh AT ABSA.CO DOT ZA>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 11:44:00 +0200
Hi Roger,

I think you are not seeing the full picture here.
As far as ADSM is concerned it does not matter
how big your physical disk packs are on MVS.
You allocate as many VSAM ESDS dsn's as are
required for the total space you require in your disk
storage pool.
To ADSM theVSAM ESDS dsn you allocated is seen
as a volume that exists in the storage pool that you
created. Collectively all the volumes allocated to this
storage pool is used to calculate if the file you are
backing up will fit or not.

Hope this helps

Cheers
Christo Heuer


>I did wrong with 3390-6, in fact it was a 3390-9 clone. I don't have
>problems with the track size, I have a problem with the maximum number of
>tracks for datasets. In general, when one want to store a dataset on disk
>(backup, archive) via adsm, adsm looks if there is a disk volume available
>where the dataset fits into (if the file is smaller than maxfilesize). If
>not, the dataset goes to tape (or whatever is next in stgp hierarchy).
>
>My problem is to store larger files on disk to limit tape drive usage.
>Today I use volumes with 2.3G. To back up files with 1 GB size, my migr.
>thresholds are 40/5.  So this means half of my disk pool is empty, always.
>With a single volume of 12 GB, thresholds of 75/50 may be ok, my 1Gig file
>will fit, and larger files will fit,too, and I can use less dasd space.
>
>If the usage of tape drives increases to limit because of a full disk pool,
>I have lost. Migration has to wait for backups to end, so the disk pool
>becomes definitively full and all further backup goes to tape.
>
>As far as I know, I can't use multivolume datasets with adsm, but I can't
>find it in the manuals.
>
>Regards
>
>Roger
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>