Re: Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames
1998-10-30 14:29:42
Subject: |
Re: Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames |
From: |
Bob Brazner <Bob.Brazner AT JCI DOT COM> |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:29:42 -0600 |
Eric,
Thanks for the reply. The problem appears to be in the registry. It
looks like some 16-bit apps register their critical files under their
8.3 name, not their long name. So, after you do a restore, the restored
registry will most likely not have the correct tilde numbers since I
agree with your assessment that Win 95 will reassign tilde numbers for
the restored files on a first come first serve basis. How does ADSM
expect me to get the registry back in sync? Am I missing something
here? Are we the only shop running 16-bit apps? What about REGREST...
does it have provisions for dealing with this problem?
Bob Brazner
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames, Brazner, Bob
- Re: Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames, Simon Watson
- Re: Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames,
Bob Brazner <=
- Re: Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames, Bruce Elrick
- Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames, Brazner , Bob [mailto:Bob.Brazner
- Re: Long filenames vs. 8.3 filenames, Simon . S . Watson
|
|
|