ADSM-L

Re: dsmfmt under AIX

1998-04-26 22:19:32
Subject: Re: dsmfmt under AIX
From: "Thomas A. La Porte" <tlaporte AT ANIM.DREAMWORKS DOT COM>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 19:19:32 -0700
Given that, and that several other people have seen this (and
that I have some free time while I wait for my ./dsmserv restore
to finish) I shall go ahead and open a call with tech support.

If I am given any further details, I shall pass them on to the
list.

 -- Tom

"It's a dog eat dog world,                Thomas A. La Porte
 and I'm wearing milkbone underwear."     DreamWorks SKG
              - Norm Peterson             <tlaporte AT anim.dreamworks DOT com>

On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Carl Makin wrote:

>     Yes I've seen this.  I didn't have time to chase it so I just used the
>     -m flag.
>
>
>______________________________ Reply Separator ____________________________
>_____
>Subject: dsmfmt under AIX
>Author:  "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> ("Thomas A. La
>Porte" <tlaporte AT ANIM.DREAMWORKS DOT COM>) at INTERNET
>
>
>
>
>     Platform: AIX 4.2.1, ADSM server, v3.1.0.2
>
>     I have created a file-system (large file-enabled) under AIX that
>
>     judas 35# ./dsmfmt -g -db /redcross1/adsm/redcrossdbvol.01 2
>
>     Which immediately prompts the following output:
>
>     Actual allocation for /redcross1/adsm/redcrossdbvol.01 will be 2049 MB
>     Insufficient Space Available for file
>     /redcross1/adsm/redcrossdbvol.01.
>
>     .
>     .
>
>     given. Certainly this is only a minor annoyance, given that it
>     does work when using -m. But why introduce the -g flag if it
>     doesn't work?
>
>     Has anybody else seen this behavior?
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>