ADSM-L

Re: ADSM on NT skipping a disk (SOLVED!!)

2015-10-04 18:00:06
Subject: Re: ADSM on NT skipping a disk (SOLVED!!)
From: Smith, Richard
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Jerry,

        Please tell me if I'm hearing you right... Did ADSM release a
new level for version 3??  If so, is this the one that contains the
permanent fix for reclamation??  Also, do I need to update the client or
server... or both??

Rick Smith
Maritz, Inc.
Storage & Security Administration
smithrr AT maritz DOT com
(314) 827-1584

> ----------
> From:         Jerry Lawson[SMTP:jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM]
> Sent:         Tuesday, March 31, 1998 8:09 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      ADSM on NT skipping a disk (SOLVED!!)
>
> ---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
> ---------------------------
> From: owner-adsm-l (INTERNET.OWNERAD) at SNADGATE
> Priority: Urgent
> Date: 3/31/98 6:04AM
> To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
> Subject: ADSM on NT skipping a disk (SOLVED!!)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Eric -
>
> Glad to hear of your success.
>
> I am also glad to report that the "quiet" mode problem has been fixed
> with
> the level 3 client.  My DSMSched.log now contains all of the detail
> messages
> about the backup!
>
> Jerry Lawson
> jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>
>
> ______________________________ Forward Header
> __________________________________
> Subject: ADSM on NT skipping a disk (SOLVED!!)
> Author:  owner-adsm-l (INTERNET.OWNERAD) at SNADGATE
> Date:    3/31/98 6:04 AM
>
>
> Hi Jerry!
> What you mentioned was a part of the problem!
> Due to the quit mode it's indeed very hard to find what has been
> backed up. I
> checked the amount of files inspected (like you suggested) and last
> night it was
>
> correct! The actual cause why the drive wasn't backed up was that the
> SYSTEM
> account had no access to the drive's root. I gave the SYSTEM account
> 'full
> access' to D:\ and this solved my problem. Thank you all for helping
> me!!!
> Kindest regards, Eric van Loon
>
>
> ----------
> From:   Jerry Lawson
> Sent:   maandag 30 maart 1998 18:59
> To:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU

> Subject:        ADSM on NT skipping a disk
>
> ---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
> ---------------------------
> From: owner-adsm-l (INTERNET.OWNERAD) at SNADGATE
> Priority: Urgent
> Date: 3/30/98 8:19AM
> To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
> Subject: ADSM on NT skipping a disk
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Eric -
>
> Can I assume this is a V3 client?
>
> There is a reported bug in the V3 Level 1 client that seems to match

> your
> problem - The scheduler log only reports in Quiet mode.  Thus it looks
> as
> though the drive is skipped, but in fact, it just doesn't tell you
> that it
> did anything.  The C: drive generally gets a message something like
> "incremental complete for c: with errors...." having to do with the
> NTUSER.DAT, etc.  The D: drive, if there are no error messages, does
> not get
> the same completion message, because it had no errors.
>
> Check the status at the end of the backup.... does it inspect the
> correct
> number of files for the machine?
>
> This problem (IC19507) is included in the "fixed" section of the level
> 3
> client.  I have just downloaded the client and installed it, so
> hopefully,
>  when my scheduled backup runs tomorrow, I'll be able to say this has
> been
> fixed  :-)
>
> Jerry Lawson
> jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>
>
> ______________________________ Forward Header
> __________________________________
>
> Subject: ADSM on NT skipping a disk
> Author:  owner-adsm-l (INTERNET.OWNERAD) at SNADGATE
> Date:    3/30/98 8:19 AM
>
>
> Hi ADSM-ers!
> I have a NT server with 2 drives: C: and D:, both labelled.
> When I issue a DSMC i to start an incremental, both disks are backed
> up.
> When an incremental is started through the scheduler only disk C: is
> backed up.
> No errors can be found in the DSMSCHED.LOG or the DSMERROR.LOG and no
> option
> file overruling is done. Anybody seen this before?? Thanks for your
> reply in
> advance!! Kindest regards, Eric van Loon
>