Advisibility of disk pools as "landing pads" only?
1998-03-19 22:07:01
Greetings, all.
I'm getting ready to define a set of disk storage volumes for my ADSM setup,
with the intent that I would be using them as a more-or-less "landing pad";
i.e. they can accept data more efficiently than the optical or tape, and I can
run more simultaneous sessions against them, but I don't really plan to keep
data on them for long: my nightly incrementals might regularly exceed the
size of the disk pool.
Someone here noted today "but that might cause migration, which I would want
to avoid during the backup window". Is there a reason to avoid that, _other_
than simply losing access to the migrating volume during the migration period?
Is this a dumb idea for some other reason? I plan to have rather a lot of
fairly small spindles for disk pool: I won't lose a lot if a few of them go
into migration during a session, and I can migrate _all_ the data off
gradually during the day, so I can have a clean slate for the next night.
Any input, or references to Fine Manuals that I might Read, would be welcome.
-Allen S. Rout
=========================================================================
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Advisibility of disk pools as "landing pads" only?,
Allen S. Rout <=
|
|
|