|
three? Is three copies of the DB volumes necessary?
1998-03-13 13:29:33
|
Subject: |
three? Is three copies of the DB volumes necessary? |
|
From: |
Joseph A Faracchio <SPGJAF AT CMSA.BERKELEY DOT EDU> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 1998 10:29:33 PST |
YES!
I'd just like to say that I finally answered this question for myself
when my 3380-JK's started failing.
I'm today looking at my second HDA replacement in as many months.
And to be able to attach a third database copy to ADSM and then be ready
to detach the failing HDA when IBM is available to replace it has
really made my work with ADSM a joy and not a pain.
SO... IBM: Please don't change the capability of 3 copies of the database
in any future releases. I only use 2 but sometimes ya gotta go to 3!
... joe.f.
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- three? Is three copies of the DB volumes necessary?,
Joseph A Faracchio <=
|
|
|
