ADSM-L

Re: Planning for tape requirements for MVS

1998-02-19 13:27:07
Subject: Re: Planning for tape requirements for MVS
From: "Wendrock, Richard O" <wendrro AT TEXACO DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 12:27:07 -0600
Randall,
I am amazed that you get by with TWO! tape drives.  Give me some Idea of the
amount of data you support and GBs per night...  Could it be that your
customers are not recovering data very often?
Regards,



> ----------
> From:         Randall Eggert[SMTP:RANDYE AT MAPCOINC DOT COM]
> Sent:         Thursday, February 19, 1998 8:05 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: Planning for tape requirements for MVS
>
> Richard,
> Depends on how you configure ADSM - (hey! that's and easy out to your
> question)
>
> We have v1 on MVS (it was installed 2+ years ago as a temporary measure),
> but I've gotten by with 2 drives.
>
> All backups here are configured to go to primary disk pool.  Once full,
> the
> secondary storage is tape.  This will utilize a drive for less time doing
> the migration than a direct to tape backup.  All our clients doing backups
> are set to do client compression.  This allows more data to be stuffed on
> the disk pools before migration is required.
>
> I have the tape retention set at 3 minutes.  Once the migration or restore
> process is finished, ADSM will deallocate the drive fairly quickly.
>
> Since most tape access is migration, a restore really doesn't affect me,
> since the migration will resume at the point where it stopped.  At this
> level of ADSM, I don't even know if a restore will supersede other
> processes.
>
> We don't have a library, so I do not do colocation (I did once, and the
> operators complained bitterly).
>
> If I am doing special work, I can issue a MVS modify command to ADSM to
> utilize more (or less) number of drives.
>
> Randall Eggert
> MAPCO, Inc.
> Tulsa, OK
> (Just down the street from the old Texaco building)
>
>
>
>
>
> "Wendrock, Richard O" <wendrro AT TEXACO DOT COM> on 02/19/98 07:17:12 AM
>
> Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> cc:    (bcc: Randall Eggert/TUL/MAPCO)
> Subject:  Planning for tape requirements for MVS
>
>
>
>
> I am trying to determine how many tape drive we will need for ADSM on MVS.
> How does ADSM manage tape drives on MVS?
> Is there a priority amongst ADSM subtask?  Does a request for recover
> carry
> a higher priority over backup?
> When does ADSM release a tape drive? (at end of tape or end of task)
>
> Regards,
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>