I have to plead ignorance at this point - some would say it's about time :-)
I don't have the V3 server installed yet. It was my understanding the
small file aggregation was a "built in" with V3 - if both client and server
were V3, you had it - nothing to turn on. As for performance.......
Jerry Lawson
jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Re: ADSM V3 Performance and Schedlog Messages
Author: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
Date: 2/10/98 6:32 PM
Jerry,
Yes we upgraded the server, and a few clients. In the clients
that are running V3 I see no performance improvement. What are the
small file aggregation option and what are the recommendations for
them??
Thanks,
Rick Smith
Maritz, Inc.
Storage & Security Administration
smithrr AT maritz DOT com
(314) 827-1584
> ----------
> From: Jerry Lawson[SMTP:jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 1998 2:27 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: ADSM V3 Performance and Schedlog Messages
>
> ---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
> ---------------------------
> From: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
> Date: 2/10/98 10:37AM
> To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
> *To: *ADSM-L at SNADGATE
> Subject: ADSM V3 Performance and Schedlog Messages
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Rick -
>
> Did you just upgrade the server to V3, or did you do clients too? It
> was my
> understanding that any performance gains would not really be seen
> until both
> clients and server were at V3 - that's when you can take advantage of
> small
> file aggregation.
>
> Jerry Lawson
> jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>
>
> ______________________________ Forward Header
> __________________________________
> Subject: ADSM V3 Performance and Schedlog Messages
> Author: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
> Date: 2/10/98 10:37 AM
>
>
> Hello ADSMer's,
>
> We just upgrade to V3 this past weekend. We are now running
> V3
> on OS\390 server and Win NT, Win 95, and UNIX boxes. I am pleased to
> say the conversion went off without a hitch, however, I have not seen
> the performance gains I though I would. Actually, I have not seen any
> significant improvement at all. I am not trying to down ADSM, but
> there
> are people who are going to want to see results!! I was just
> wondering
> if maybe there were some performance parameters that I should be
> looking
> at?? Any help would be much appreciated.
>
> Just a side note on the Schedlog not showing messages like it
> did in version 2. I am on a WIN 95 machine and all messages still get
> logged. I also noticed that any WIN NT clients still running V2 are
> logging all messages. It appears to me that only the WIN NT clients
> running V3 have this problem!! I would like to have these messages
> back, so if someone would be so kind as to tell me when PTF 3 might be
> out???
>
> Thanks,
> Rick Smith
> Maritz, Inc.
> Storage & Security Administration
> smithrr AT maritz DOT com
> (314) 827-1584
>
|
