ADSM-L

Re: Large Sites

1998-02-10 09:40:21
Subject: Re: Large Sites
From: Ben Kokenge <ben AT EDMS DOT NET>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 08:40:21 -0600
Laurie,

        If you are in Perth, then why not go down Hay Street and ask
        PGS (they are in the IBM building 4 blocks away).  They have
        a 27 tb system.

        If they are no help, I know of some 50 tb systems I can tell you
        about.



DeMamiel, Laurie L.R. wrote:

> We have had ADSM in place for 12 months now and working well in my
> opinion. We are currently running version 2.1 on a OS/390 server. We
> service an environmnet of about 2.5 tb, consisting of NT, Solaris, AIX,
> SGI clients. We had plans to migrate from OS/390 to an AIX server
> sometime this year.As other applications that we have on OS/390 are and
> will be moved to AIX,  we can't keep OS/390 just for ADSM.
> However a study has been commissioned by Mgt in the company I work for
> and they are reviewing other solutions.
> One concern expressed by those who doubt ADSM, is how scalable it is. We
> are planning to have an environment of 7tb by the end of this year and
> there is concerns that we would not be able to service that with ADSM ,
> either version 2 or 3.
>
> My questions are:
> Are there sites out there that are larger than 7tb ? If so how large ?
> What setup do you have to service that environment ie server, network,
> etc.
> Any answers would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Laurie de Mamiel

 --
Benjamin Kokenge
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Large Sites, DeMamiel, Laurie L.R.
    • Re: Large Sites, Ben Kokenge <=