Re: RECLAMATION
1997-12-29 12:46:11
i got the same problem here. after the reclamation running for a while and
emptied two tapes. the one was filling became full and then the
reclamation process terminated ("insufficient space in storage pool"). i
thought it would use the newly emptied tapes but obviously it didn't. it
tried to use a tape that was already full. i got two more tapes still
iligible for the reclamation threshhold i set.
any ideas? thanks.
yu chen
-- As Zeus said to Narcissus, "Watch yourself."
On Mon, 29 Dec 1997, Mark Linehan wrote:
On Mon, 29 Dec 1997, Mark Linehan wrote:
** Okay, I set the reclamation threshhold to 30 and it immediately decided it
** wanted to reclaim volume SLTJS1. It began to reclaim data using volume
** SLTGS2, which was filled. When SLTGS2 became filled, the reclamation
** porcess bombed out rather than moving to another tape. We have TWO tapes
** which are not FULL. We have NO tapes which are scratch volumes. Adstar now
** seems determined on finding a scratch volume to continue reclamation, but
** we have none. Is there a setting to allow reclamation to occur using
** NON-SCRATCH volumes, or am I overlooking something else???
**
** Mark Linehan
** Information Services
** The North Shore Medical Center
** markl AT nsmc.partners DOT org
**
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: reclamation, (continued)
- Re: reclamation, Mark Linehan
- Re[2]: reclamation, ALLEN BARTH
- Re: reclamation, Rodney S. Richeson
- Re: Re[2]: reclamation, Hilton Tina
- Re: Re[2]: reclamation, Sean Garvey
- Re: reclamation, Doug Thorneycroft
- Re: reclamation, Jerry Lawson
- Re: reclamation, Dave Crockett
- Re: reclamation, David Cannon
- RECLAMATION, Mark Linehan
- Re: RECLAMATION,
Yu Chen <=
- Re: RECLAMATION, Bill King
- Re: RECLAMATION, Yu Chen
- reclamation, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
- Re: reclamation, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
|
|
|