ADSM-L

Re: TCP/IP 3.2 much better

1997-05-23 11:17:01
Subject: Re: TCP/IP 3.2 much better
From: Jim Kleberg <jrkleberg AT STATESTREET DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 11:17:01 -0400
     Rene,
        Could you be specific as to what PTFs were necessary?
     
     
        Jim Kleberg - State Street


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: TCP/IP 3.2 much better
Author:  Rene.Lambelet (Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM)
Date:    5/22/97 9:52 AM


Hello tout le monde,
     
since my last message concerning unlimited waits during Restores and 
TCP/IP V3R2 (MVS 5.2.0 as server, ADSM 2.1.0.12), we progressed 
considerably.
     
We are now running this newest version (3.2) but we had to apply the 
last corrections (PTF's) available from IBM-Support. The Restores run 
fine, no more problems.
     
The backups too. But please pay attention not to let any trace running 
inside TCP/IP. We did this by inadvertence (trace on) and noticed 100% 
performance degradation, which is quite normal anyway!
     
René Lambelet, Nestle, CH-1800 Vevey
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>