---------------------------- Top of message ----------------------------
>>--> 05-12-97  14:18  S.SHEPPARD     (SHS)    MVS TCP/IP....
>>--> 05-12-97  14:18  S.SHEPPARD     (SHS)    MVS TCP/IP....

We have come back up on 3.2 after getting the most serious of our prob-
lems solved.  Since doing so, we have discovered one new one and one
old one, both of which we are living with for now.  One (PQ04331), has
to do with ACB control block buildup and the other (PQ00036) is an
enqueue problem in FTP.  We received a test copy of the fix for PQ01046
(FTP to tape not working) which resolves that problem.
Sam Sheppard
San Diego Data Processing Corp.
shs AT sddpc.sannet DOT gov
(619)-581-9668
-----------------------------------------------------------------------`
---------------------------- Top of message ----------------------------
---------------------------- Top of message ----------------------------
>>--> 05-12-97  13:17  ..NETMAIL     ()     MVS TCP/IP....
>>--> 05-12-97  13:17  ..NETMAIL     ()     MVS TCP/IP....
>
>From:         Jerry Lawson <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM>
>Subject:      MVS TCP/IP....
>To:           ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>
>Date:     May 12, 1997             Time: 1:55 PM
>From:     Jerry Lawson
>          The Hartford Insurance Group
>          (860) 547-2960           jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>For the last couple of weeks there has been discussion about MVS TCP/IP 3.2,
>and the problems it has been causing.  I was talking with the Network folks
>here, and the lady who supports TCP/IP related other problems that they had
>been having with 3.2 - apparently it's not a pretty sight.
>
>Then she asked me to post a question to the list - is anyone out there using
>MVS TCP/IP 3.3 yet?  If so, is it any better?
>
>
>
>                                        Jerry
-----------------------------------------------------------------------`
=========================================================================