Re: Different includes/excludes
1997-02-19 09:15:29
Subject: |
Re: Different includes/excludes |
From: |
"Wood, Darren" <DWood AT HOF.CO DOT UK> |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 1997 14:15:29 -0000 |
Dave,
You could set up another management class which would have a
backup frequency of 7 days. You would then bind your large directories
to this management class, as well as your daily backups to their
respective management classes all within the one include/exclude file.
Hope this helps.
Darren
>----------
>From: Dave Sanders[SMTP:DSanders AT MASSMUTUAL DOT COM]
>Sent: 19 February 1997 13:51
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject: Re: Different includes/excludes
>
>This still puzzles me then,,,,, how can I get that scenerio to play? The
>situation is that we want a limited set of files/directories to be
>incrementally backed-up during the week,,,, but those same files and
>several other large directories (these are to large to be backedup during
>the week to meet the processing window, thus the decision to NOT do them
>during the week).
>
>BTW Andy, this particular server is HARTCT1-APP. You may remember their
>processing requirements.
>
>----------
>> From: Andy Raibeck <araibeck AT VNET.IBM DOT COM>
>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject: Re: Different includes/excludes
>> Date: Tuesday, February 18, 1997 3:11 PM
>>
>> Dave Sanders asks:
>>
>> > A client would like to have a seperate include/exclude list during the
>week
>> > vs. during the weekend. I know there have been discussions about this
>in
>> > the past,,, but could someone refresh the topic??
>>
>> Some issues/problems you can run into:
>>
>> - Backup versions of files that were included but are subsequently
>excluded
>> will be expired the next time incremental backup runs. In other words,
>the
>> exclusion is for all backup versions, not just for any that might have
>been
>> created while using that version of the include/exclude list.
>>
>> - If you change the management class on an INCLUDE statement, all
>existing
>> backup versions of files affected by that INCLUDE will be re-bound to
>that
>> management class (i.e. you can't have Monday - Friday's backups bound
>to
>> one management class, and Saturday's backup bound to another -- all
>backup
>> versions of the same file must be bound to the same management class).
>>
>> In general, I wouldn't recommend flip-flopping include/exclude lists
>around,
>> although I don't have the specifics of your particular situation.
>>
>> Andy Raibeck
>> ADSM Level 2 Support
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Different includes/excludes, Dave Sanders
- Re: Different includes/excludes, Larimer, Dave
- Re: Different includes/excludes, Andy Raibeck
- Re: Different includes/excludes, David Hendrix
- Re: Different includes/excludes, Dave Sanders
- Re: Different includes/excludes, Dave Sanders
- Re: Different includes/excludes, Andy Raibeck
- Re: Different includes/excludes,
Wood, Darren <=
- Re: Different includes/excludes, Mattice Dave
- Re: Different includes/excludes, Hilton Tina
- Re[2]: Different includes/excludes, Bill Colwell
- Re: Different includes/excludes, David Hendrix
- Re[2]: Different includes/excludes, Jerry Lawson
- Re: Re[2]: Different includes/excludes, Dave Sanders
- Re: Re[2]: Different includes/excludes, Konrad Bauer
- Re[2]: Different includes/excludes, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
- Re[2]: Different includes/excludes, Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
- Re: Re[2]: Different includes/excludes, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
|
|
|