ADSM-L

Q's about weekly, monthly, yearly backups.

2015-10-04 18:10:54
Subject: Q's about weekly, monthly, yearly backups.
From: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
To: Jerry Lawson at TISDMAIL
Date: 9/3/96 2:28PM
ADSM is not your father's backup product!   :-)

Because of it's design, and the use of the Data Base, it is not a requirement 
to do full
backups.  This is supported by the lack of any "easy" way to do a full backup - 
you can't just
click on "full" and let 'er rip.  The design lets you always get to the latest 
copy of the files,
thus allowing ADSM to go directly to the files that made up your disk the last 
time it was
backed up.
Additionally, if you do a full restore, you don't have to do the full volume 
and then apply the
incrementals or differentials.  Each file is only handled once.  They are 
processed in tape
order to eliminate back spacing on the tape.
 All of this minimizes network traffic, which in my shop is the critical 
resource.

The only argument that I have heard that begins to make sense for full backups 
is that a "full"
backup allows for the smallest number of tapes to manage.
Perhaps this is true, but I rely on my tape automation system to worry about 
that.  ADSM
can use a process called collocation to keep files from a user together on a 
minimum set of
tapes that generally only "belong" to him, so this is not a strong argument, in 
my opinion.

Because of this design, we keep things simple here - we just set up a single 
policy domain for
an area, and tell people to stick ADSM in their Start Up folders and forget 
about it - let the
scheduler handle the backups for them.
Behind the scenes, the daily incrementals keep popping off without a problem.

As they said in Star Trek 5 "Let go of your pain....."

Jerry Lawson jlawson AT itthartford DOT com
________________________Forward Header________________________
Author: INTERNET.OWNERAD
Subject: Q's about weekly, monthly, yearly backups.
09-03-96 02:28 PM

[This is a question from someone who has no formal ADSM training but has tried 
to read the
ADSM docs on the subject, so it's a pretty newbie question.]

I am trying to understand how the traditional weekly, monthly, and yearly 
backup schedules
I'm used to translate into ADSM. By traditional, I mean the following schedule:

Daily incremental backups are made for a machine.
Each week, a full backup is made and kept for 4 weeks.
The first weekly backup is also considered a monthly backup and is kept for
12 months.
The first monthly backup is also considered a yearly backup and is kept for
7 years.

This works fine in the one file system->one set of tapes->one backup mode, but 
ADSM
complicates things mightily.

I am trying to backup multiple systems each on a different day (for the weekly) 
to a single
stgpool (or active policy set -- I'm still a little hazy
 on the nomenclature) and then backing that stgpool up to a copy stgpool for 
off site storage.
I want the off site tapes to be stored for a set period of time (4 weeks, 12 
months, or 7
years) and then be returned and immediately re-used.

So my questions are do I need to use different management groups (policy set?) 
with
different retentions for the daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly backups? Or do 
I need a
separate copy stgpool for each type?

If the above did not make it clear, I am confused. Any help would be 
appreciated.

Thanks for your time,
Owen Crow
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Q's about weekly, monthly, yearly backups., INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE <=