ADSM-L

Re[2]: ADSM HSM support for OS/2, NT, and DEC environments.

1997-01-07 08:03:44
Subject: Re[2]: ADSM HSM support for OS/2, NT, and DEC environments.
From: Claus Schroeder <Claus.Schroeder AT TD.HEMPEL DOT DK>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 08:03:44 -0500
We would also very much like to have this feature on the OS/2 platform
and we are not planning to switch to NT servers.

BTW, as I am writing, this list and the support from the IBM ADSM-team
is the best way to get support I have experienced. Thank you very much
for this to especially the ADSM-team and the other very enganged
people willing to share and help.

Kind regards

Claus Schroeder

Hempels Marine Paints A/S
Denmark

e-mail: Claus.schroeder AT td.hempel DOT dk

Don,
        There is an HSM product for NT that interfaces with ADSM... it
used to
be from a company called Avail but I think Wang Software owns it now.
For the DEC Alpha, you can supposedly use the FX!32 software from
Digital to convert the Intel based version of ADSM to run on the DEC
Alpha running NT.

Tim Pittson
tpittson AT himail.hcc DOT com

>----------
>From:  Don Ludwig[SMTP:Don.Ludwig AT CCMAIL.FINGERHUT DOT COM]
>Sent:  Friday, January 03, 1997 4:45 PM
>To:    Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L
>Subject:       ADSM HSM support for OS/2, NT, and DEC environments.
>
>     Hi,,,I read under "Frequently asked ADSM questions" on the ADSM
>     homepage that the HSM functions are currently supported under
AIX
>     3.2.5 and 4.1, Solaris 2.5.  Also it states that WANG is working
on a
>     product to be used in an NT environment.  It also states that
the OS/2
>     platform is a requirement but the is no "current plan" to
provide this
>     support.  My questions for IBM and other storage management
gurus:
>
>     1.) Will IBM come out with the HSM peice for OS/2, NT and DEC
Alpha?
>         If so can someone give me a "wishful thinking time frame"?
>
>     2.) If IBM is not going to support the environments above (HSM
>         speaking).  Are there other products available that do?
>
>     We like ADSM alot, but from reading the questions I don't get a
warm
>     fuzzy feeling that IBM will be actively persuing these areas.
If not
>     we need to find an alternative. (If there is one)  Were most
concerned
>     with the OS/2 environment.   Thanks ahead of time for any
replys!!!!
>     Don.ludwig AT ccmail.fingerhut DOT com
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>