ADSM-L

Re: Number of migration process

1996-08-29 13:06:18
Subject: Re: Number of migration process
From: "Pittson, Timothy ,Corp,US" <tpittson AT HIMAIL.HCC DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 13:06:18 -0400
Have you considered setting up this large client to go directly to tape
instead of to the disk storagepool first ??

Tim Pittson
tpittson AT himail.hcc DOT com

>----------
>From:  Paulo Chiquito[SMTP:chiquito AT VNET.IBM DOT COM]
>Sent:  Thursday, August 29, 1996 9:10 AM
>To:    Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L
>Subject:       Re: Number of migration process
>
>Gee, I really have data from just one node. Can't I change that ? This
>client
>is backing up a huge amount of data (180 Giga) and I can't wait for
>just one
>drive to do all the work!! Also I can't split the work between two
>machines.
>
>Thanks
>Paulo Cesar Chiquito
>chiquito AT vnet.ibm DOT com
>
>
>------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------
>
>From root Thu Aug 29 09:02:58 1996
>Sender: sheelagh.treweek AT computing-services.oxford.ac DOT uk
>Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 14:04:26 +0100
>From: Sheelagh Treweek
><sheelagh.treweek AT computing-services.oxford.ac DOT uk>
>To: CHIQUITO AT VNET.IBM DOT COM
>Subject: Re: Number of migration process
>
>>Where else can I check? Am I missing some other parameter?
>
>Paulo, You could find out whether there is only data in the pool
>from a single node - because if that is true, ADSM will only run
>one process. Apart from that, I can think of no other reason just
>now. [Use QUERY CONTENT on the stg pool volume.]
>
>Regards, Sheelagh
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------
>Sheelagh Treweek                         Email:
>sheelagh.treweek AT oucs.ox.ac DOT uk
>Oxford University Computing Services     Tel:   +44 (0)1865 273205
>13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN, UK     Fax:   +44 (0)1865 273275
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------
>
>------------- End Forwarded Message -------------
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>