My former company did the same exact scenario on 3/17/96 and ADSM was not an
issue providing that you quiesce the system like you should.  The only
problem they had after the move was that an application did not execute as
well on a RX63 system as compared to a 3090 600J.  It had to do with the
vendor not using the bin option on Cobol programs.

At 03:30 PM 5/28/96 -0500, you wrote:
>
> OUR SITE IS PLANNING TO MOVE ALL THE MAINFRAME DASD TO A DIFFERENT
> STATE NEXT MONTH.  THE PLAN IS TO USE FDR TO DO FULL VOLUME BACKUP
> AND RESTORES TO DASD ALREADY INSTALLED AT THE NEW LOCATION.  DOES
> ANYONE KNOW IF ADSM WILL HAVE A PROBLEM MOVING THE DATABASE,
> RECOVERY LOG AND PRIMARY STORAGE POOLS THIS WAY?
>