Re: DB usage for copy stgpools
1996-06-03 09:39:00
Text item: Body.822
IBM told me to expect 30% growth. The base record in the database for a
file is about 700 bytes long, and the copypool info adds 200 bytes.
Bill Colwell
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Cambridge Ma.
_________________________Reply Header_________________________
Author: ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
Subject: DB usage for copy stgpools
05-31-96 05:07 PM
Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 17:07:00 -06
From: Mike Stewart <STEWAJM AT auducadm.duc.auburn DOT edu>
Subject: DB usage for copy stgpools
To: Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>
I've recently migrated to Version 2 of the ADSM Server,
and am now preparing to implement a copy storage pool.
How much additional database space does a copy storage pool
require? Lets say I keep a copy of all the files.
Does that database space usage double because now I have
twice as many files as before? The few tests that I've
run don't seem to be that bad, but I didn't see anything
in an (admittedly rather quick) search of the ADSM
V2 manuals.
|
|
|