ADSM-L

Re: DB usage for copy stgpools

1996-06-03 09:39:00
Subject: Re: DB usage for copy stgpools
From: Bill Colwell <bcolwell AT CCLINK.DRAPER DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1996 09:39:00 -0400
Text item: Body.822
IBM told me to expect 30% growth.  The base record in the database for a
file is about 700 bytes long, and the copypool info adds 200 bytes.

Bill Colwell
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Cambridge Ma.
_________________________Reply Header_________________________
Author: ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
Subject: DB usage for copy stgpools
05-31-96 05:07 PM

Date:         Fri, 31 May 1996 17:07:00 -06
From:         Mike Stewart <STEWAJM AT auducadm.duc.auburn DOT edu>
Subject:      DB usage for copy stgpools
To:           Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>

I've recently migrated to Version 2 of the ADSM Server,
and am now preparing to implement a copy storage pool.

How much additional database space does a copy storage pool
require?  Lets say I keep a copy of all the files.
Does that database space usage double because now I have
twice as many files as before?  The few tests that I've
run don't seem to be that bad, but I didn't see anything
in an (admittedly rather quick) search of the ADSM
V2 manuals.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>