|
ATTN IBM: How about cutting SMF records for ADSM processes?
1995-10-27 09:53:05
|
Subject: |
ATTN IBM: How about cutting SMF records for ADSM processes? |
|
From: |
Andy Raibeck <raibeck AT CONNIX DOT COM> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Oct 1995 13:53:05 +0000 |
I know that ADSM cuts SMF (or similar, depending on platform) records for
client session. Has anyone at IBM considered cutting records for processes
after they've completed? It would be helpful if they contained information
such as CPU utilization, start and stop times, number of files and bytes
moved and/or deleted, and any other information that might be useful for
monitoring ADSM resource utilization.
Your thoughts?
Andy Raibeck
Connecticut Mutual
203-987-3521
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- ATTN IBM: How about cutting SMF records for ADSM processes?,
Andy Raibeck <=
|
|
|
