> I was contacted by Interlink when we were in the process of evaluating
> TCP/IP for MVS.  Interlink's version does provide more thoughput than
> IBM's but I don't believe ADSM is compatable with the Interlink IP
> stack.
>
> It's been two years since we looked at it so things may have changed,
> but, I would verify with Interlink that it work's with ADSM now.
>
> Darren Fuson.
> Community Mutual Insurance Company.

ADSM DOES support Interlink's TCPaccess! There was a press release of IBM and
Interlink some time in winter. You will find it on IBM Raleigh WWW server.
Interlink supports currently about 9000 IP sessions parallelly. Interlink
also did a great job together with New Era for Harbor, so Interlink is not
the most first TCP/IP comm SW choice for the two most powerful backup/restore
systems on the market. BTW Interlink has a WWW server, too
(http://www.interlink.com)

best regards,

Pekka Kurki
Intellectics GesmbH

>
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator __________________________
> _______ Subject: More than 2000 clients ???
> Author:  "Dist. Stor. Manager(ADSM) List" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> at
> SMTP Date:    5/26/95 11:27 AM
>
>
> We are also in a planning stage for Enterprise wide backup. I think the
> main bottle neck will be the 3172 or in your case the LAN adapter. I
> was told that Interlink provides about 10 times more thruput. Is any
> one using Interlink on this list ?
>
>
> Deba Patnaik

(Mr.) Pekka K. Kurki   Tel. +43-2256-815811
Intellectics GesmbH    Fax  +43-2256-815819
Schloss-Strasse 619    e-mail: pekka_kurki AT intellectics.co DOT at
A-2551 Enzesfeld       X.400:  PN=pekka_kurki; O=intellectics
Austria                        PRMD=co; ADMD=ADA; CT=AT