Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3494\s+Tape\s+Libraries\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

21. Re: 3494 Tape Libraries (score: 1)
Author: Sheelagh Treweek <sheelagh.treweek AT COMPUTING-SERVICES.OXFORD.AC DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:32:05 +0000
Mauro, I admit I have never fully understood the internals of the 3494 PC! But what I think think happens is that the second disk just has the OS/2 and the Library Manager software and *not* the data
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg00701.html (12,606 bytes)

22. Re: 3494 Tape Libraries (score: 1)
Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 08:39:03 -0500
According to the redbook "3494: A Practical Guide" that I cited yesterday: The primary hard disk drive contains the OS and one copy of the library database. Without the HA1 feature, the second disk
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg00714.html (12,730 bytes)

23. Re: 3494 Tape Libraries (score: 1)
Author: Sheelagh Treweek <sheelagh.treweek AT COMPUTING-SERVICES.OXFORD.AC DOT UK>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:22:18 +0000
Thanks Richard, I think my brain died sometime in the last few months! That makes sense : the second disk's copy of the database is kept up to date all the time and there is a one off saving of the O
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg00717.html (12,538 bytes)

24. Re: 3494 Tape Libraries (score: 1)
Author: Simon Watson <simon.s.watson AT SHELL.COM DOT BN>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:03:48 +0800
Sheelagh, I was informed by IBM that it was an IBM CE job to maintain, and that we should not touch it. Basically we should treat it not as another computer, but as any other normal piece of hardwar
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg00763.html (12,079 bytes)

25. Re: 3494 Tape Libraries (score: 1)
Author: "Brian T. Huntley" <bth AT CLARKSON DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 23:06:07 -0500
// >I'd be interested to know Simon (if you know) why IBM said not to touch // >it as this is contrary to the advice we have been given by IBM in UK? // // Sheelagh, // // I was informed by IBM that
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-02/msg00769.html (13,195 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu