Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bacula\-users\]\s+Error\s+authenticating\s*$/: 39090 ]

Total 39090 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time? (score: 1)
Author: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 16:08:01 +0200
Hi Stephen, not real "bugs", but rather some weird messages about the EOT tag not being found and other stuff when you run them, the scripts seem to have worked fine on my catalogs though. All the be
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00153.html (12,962 bytes)

182. Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time? (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Thompson <stephen AT seismo.berkeley DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:34:14 -0700
Help? Well, the compile and install went fine, but the update tables script is having issue. I was running 7.0.5 before. Not sure what database version, but likely whatever was appropriate to 7.0.5.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00154.html (16,110 bytes)

183. Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time? (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Thompson <stephen AT seismo.berkeley DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:38:40 -0700
Spoke too soon, I see what's going on, I was running update script from new location (7.2.0) and it's referencing old location (7.0.5) and running the wrong mysql script. -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00155.html (17,389 bytes)

184. Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time? (score: 1)
Author: "Raymond Burns Jr." <rburnsj AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:50:04 +0000
Did you run a backup of the database? If not, I bet you were terrified with all the errors :) Same thing happened to me going to 7.0.5, and it sent me for a frenzy. I didn't run a backup of the datab
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00156.html (18,874 bytes)

185. Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time? (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Thompson <stephen AT seismo.berkeley DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:01:29 -0700
I run daily backups of my database and had finished my monthly full run for September, so I was technically covered. However I was not looking forward to restoring a 900+Gb mysql database from a text
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00157.html (21,257 bytes)

186. Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time? (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Thompson <stephen AT seismo.berkeley DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:02:49 -0700
So far so good. Minor snafu on my part when updating database, but I'm running 7.2 now. Looking good so far. Will find out more when hundreds of jobs run tonight. Stephen -- Stephen Thompson Berkeley
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00158.html (13,308 bytes)

187. Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:00:50 -1000
Are you using InnoDB?  Are you properly configured for InnoDB?  If not, you should be.  MyISAM tables really should not be used in production any more, and Oracle is moving towards deprecating the M
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00159.html (15,081 bytes)

188. Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Phil Stracchino <phils AT caerllewys DOT net>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 14:37:47 -0400
Principal items I would check: - Make sure innodb_buffer_pool_size is adequate - Make sure innodb_buffer-pool_instances is set appropriately - Make sure innodb_io_capacity is set appropriately for yo
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00160.html (13,268 bytes)

189. Re: [Bacula-users] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Craig Shiroma <shiroma.craig.2 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:06:06 -1000
Principal items I would check: - Make sure innodb_buffer_pool_size is adequate - Make sure innodb_buffer-pool_instances is set appropriately - Make sure innodb_io_capacity is set appropriately for y
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00161.html (14,852 bytes)

190. Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time? (score: 1)
Author: Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 15:14:58 -0400
Good luck. Kern -- _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00162.html (13,309 bytes)

191. [Bacula-users] getting a full system backup (score: 1)
Author: Thing <thing.thing AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:07:28 +1300
Hi, From my initial trial the backup and restore works for, /usr/sbin/ So I have now specified / to back up the full machine, but the backup will not do this,  continuning to do just /usr/sbin/ == Fi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00163.html (13,050 bytes)

192. [Bacula-users] ERR message (score: 1)
Author: Thing <thing.thing AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:09:23 +1300
Hi, trying to set up bacula on a RaspberryPi and I have this error, == bconsole: bsock.c:223 Socket open error. proto=10 port=9101. ERR=Address family not supported by protocol == root@raspberrypi:/b
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00164.html (13,137 bytes)

193. Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time? (score: 1)
Author: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe.schuerkamp AT nionex DOT net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 09:49:50 +0200
One word: innobackupex. You'll be up running in a few minutes again as opposed to a week when using a text file created by mysqldump (which, much like MyISAM tables, should be taken round the back an
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00165.html (13,495 bytes)

194. [Bacula-users] Question about verify job expirations (score: 1)
Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:20:13 +0200
Hi mates, The first question I have is : - Sometime ago, I asked here if the verification init catalog jobs could expire, in order to need a new init catalog for new verify catalogs to run. Have foun
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00166.html (11,306 bytes)

195. [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1)
Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:57:55 +0200
Hi mates, Have been doing some checks with Bacula and TLS. At present I have a TLS enable directive, require tis to yes and the ca certificate public key (of an own CA) copied in the server and the c
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00167.html (13,257 bytes)

196. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1)
Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 20:03:36 +0200
Have been taking a look to all this in the source code It seems that TLS Verify Peer basically ends up by doing (look at bold please) : /* * Create a new TLS_CONTEXT instance. * Returns: Pointer to T
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00168.html (21,730 bytes)

197. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1)
Author: Ana Emília M. Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:46:22 -0300
Hello, The TLS enable do not force the use of TLS. For example, if you configure your director with TLS enable = yes and TLS require = no, clients can communicate with your director with or without T
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00169.html (24,698 bytes)

198. Re: [Bacula-users] Question about bacula and tls (score: 1)
Author: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea <egoitz AT ramattack DOT net>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 23:20:21 +0200
Good night, First of all thanks a lot for your time :) El 28/9/2015, a las 21:46, Ana Emília M. Arruda <emiliaarruda AT gmail DOT com> escribió: Hello, The TLS enable do not force the use of TLS. For
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00170.html (30,149 bytes)

199. [Bacula-users] Fw: read this (score: 1)
Author: <ed AT gurski DOT com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 23:17:17 -0700
Hello! New message, please read http://www.jazzvillapinheiros.com.br/down.php ed AT gurski DOT com -- _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users AT lists.s
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00171.html (11,667 bytes)

200. [Bacula-users] Fedora/CentOS/RHEL Bacula 7.2.0 status and backports repository (score: 1)
Author: Simone Caronni <negativo17 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:31:58 +0200
Hello, Bacula 7.2.0 is now in rawhide (Fedora 24) and pending update in Fedora 23, the idea is to have Fedora 23 already shipping with Bacula 7.2.x. I'm planning to delete the Bacula 5.x repository o
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Bacula-users/2015-09/msg00172.html (14,243 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu