Author: Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:20:44 +0000
We debated having a copy pool when doing our DD setup. We finally decided that using a daily DD snapshot was an acceptable solution. We take a Rick The problem with that is that you'd just be replica
Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:52:47 -0400
I guess I don't see the difference. If logical corruption (rm -r * in the filepool or tsm screws up and deletes vols), the copy pool could be just as corrupt as the main pool. if the copy pool is in
Author: Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:05:45 +0000
I guess I don't see the difference. If logical corruption (rm -r * in the filepool or tsm screws up and deletes vols), the copy pool could be just as corrupt as the main pool. if the copy pool is in
Author: "Bradberry, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Bradberry AT ACS-HCS DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 11:49:07 -0400
I am currently looking at Data Domain as a possible VTL and de-duplication vender. Can anyone share there experiences with Data Domain with TSM? I am also looking at SEPATON as an "out of band" solut
Author: "Lepre, James" <jlepre AT SOLIXINC DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 12:11:27 -0400
I curently have the quantum DXI 5500 setup with Tivoli and it is performing fantastic. However, since this is a new product you will face some growing pains. What I like is that it does hardware comp
Author: Dirk Kastens <Dirk.Kastens AT UNI-OSNABRUECK DOT DE>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:45:38 +0200
Kenneth, Bradberry, Kenneth schrieb: I am currently looking at Data Domain as a possible VTL and de-duplication vender. Can anyone share there experiences with Data Domain with TSM? We just tested a
We are averaging about 11/1 with data domain on a mix of data. One thing we found was the need to update a setting for tsm tape marker parameter, which almost doubled our performance. Cory Heikel Tiv
Author: William Jean <wjean AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:03:01 -0400
Can you share the details of the tape marker setting? We are averaging about 11/1 with data domain on a mix of data. One thing we found was the need to update a setting for tsm tape marker parameter,
The command can be different depending on which version of the software you are running. In the latest version it is: option set marker-type {nw1 | cv1 | tsm1 | tsm2 | eti1 | hpdp1 | none} Set the ta
Author: Curtis Preston <cpreston AT GLASSHOUSE DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:22:50 -0400
That would match what I've heard most often. While users of most other backup products are seeing an average of 20:1 on most data, that ratio relies on having full backups to compare against. TSM's p