Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ADSM\-L\]\s+Lost\s+in\s+TSM\s+licensing\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Len Boyle <Len.Boyle AT SAS DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:21:41 -0400
Yes the number of processors does include the ht processor count. This a dual 3.60GHz Intel Xeon (Hyper- Threaded) machine. Here is part of the output of the set command: NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS=4 OS=Wi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00431.html (14,505 bytes)

22. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:18:11 -0700
Yes the number of processors does include the ht processor count. This a dual 3.60GHz Intel Xeon (Hyper- Threaded) machine. The issue to me here isn't whether you can get CPU information from a wind
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00432.html (14,159 bytes)

23. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Angus Macdonald <Angus.Macdonald AT NWW-TR.WALES.NHS DOT UK>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:15:48 +0100
An Intel Xeon with AMD64 architecture? Yes the number of processors does include the ht processor count. This a dual 3.60GHz Intel Xeon (Hyper- Threaded) machine. Here is part of the output of the se
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00433.html (14,746 bytes)

24. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Henrik Wahlstedt <SHWL AT STATOIL DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:49:25 +0200
Hi, Not to argue about the licensing... We could use the tools MS offer like WMIC, Windows Management Instrumentation Command-line to script CPU count. wmic /node:"%1" cpu Etc.. wmic /node:"%1" qfe w
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00462.html (13,852 bytes)

25. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:07:14 -0700
about a >server. enough >rights on the remote machine. Ahhh, the ol don't have rights issue. Which is why I keep saying the best way to get the info is to build it into the client so it can get and
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00471.html (12,495 bytes)

26. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Warren <Matthew_WARREN AT BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:19:44 +0100
Hmm, there is always a scheduled TSM command that send's it's output to a file you have rights to look at later? On occaision for small adhoc tasks I have used the TSM scheduler to initiate a command
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00473.html (14,951 bytes)

27. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:29:57 -0700
So what you are saying is I still have to manually restore hundreds of files from hundreds of systems to a location, and hopefully the file name is different on each one or it will overwrite it ever
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00474.html (15,751 bytes)

28. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Warren <Matthew_WARREN AT BNPPARIBAS DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:53:04 +0100
Not quite. I'm a big one for scripting in either unix or windows environments. restore the files via script, rename each restored file before pulling the next one in. Extract the info you want from t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00475.html (17,455 bytes)

29. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:12:52 -0400
This is true. I prefer to strongly de-emphasize the extent to which I've root-kitted all my clients boxes. Going behind the admin's back to do some administrative operation you dreamed up doesn't en
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00477.html (13,550 bytes)

30. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: William Boyer <bjdboyer AT COMCAST DOT NET>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:14:42 -0400
Instead of having to restore each *.LOG file every day, why not just code a POSTSCHEDULECMD that FTP's all the *.LOG files to a central server as <nodename>.dsm*.log Bill Boyer "Life isn't about how
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00478.html (18,549 bytes)

31. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Wanda Prather <wprather AT JASI DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:14:53 -0500
Not to mention that it's just Too Silly. The client already reports back to the server what platform it is. It's not like the client doesn't know, or can't find out, the information that the server n
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00479.html (14,159 bytes)

32. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Schaub, Steve" <steve_schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:30:06 -0400
OK, all the real-world TSM Admins agree that the client should provide the info that IBM demands. Who we haven't heard from are the IBM people - I'd like to hear from the developers why this cant/won
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00480.html (15,074 bytes)

33. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:50:57 -0400
The KPMG type is dinging me for when I will get the revised spreadsheet back to him -- so I looked at it again -- and my brain broke. They want the count of _processor chips_ and the number of cores
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00482.html (15,738 bytes)

34. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Remeta, Mark" <MRemeta AT SELIGMANDATA DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:54:48 -0400
I've been ignoring my KPMG guy :) I sent him the output of the commands he wanted, let him fill out the spreadsheet. The KPMG type is dinging me for when I will get the revised spreadsheet back to hi
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00483.html (17,364 bytes)

35. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Boatright <boatrke1 AT MEMORIALHEALTH DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:06:36 -0400
Is there a different way they are licensing VMWare ESX host? Wonder how they will handle the VMware consolidated backup proxy agent with TSM??? Kevin The KPMG type is dinging me for when I will get t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00484.html (16,775 bytes)

36. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:13:52 -0700
Here's what I've been told by the so-called Deloitte experts that are doing our audit. 1 server, no matter how many hosts are on it and backing up, has a limited number of physical CPU's/cores. If i
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00486.html (13,306 bytes)

37. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Stef Coene <stef.coene AT DOCUM DOT ORG>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:18:02 +0200
For vmware, you need licenses for the box just like it's one big host. The number of guests is not important. Idem for tdp licenses. Stef
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00487.html (12,911 bytes)

38. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Kauffman, Tom" <KauffmanT AT NIBCO DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:22:16 -0400
And that's the claim for the RS-6000 environment, as well. Which (again) points out how stupid a per-cpu license is for a data backup/archiving product. Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc For vmware, you need l
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00489.html (13,884 bytes)

39. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Stef Coene <stef.coene AT DOCUM DOT ORG>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:08:20 +0200
It's nice to have a 32 cpu p590 with an lpar with 1 cpu (hard limited to 10% of a cpu) and I want to backup the oracle database on that lpar with rman. This costs me 32 x the license of the tdp .....
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00492.html (13,101 bytes)

40. Re: [ADSM-L] Lost in TSM licensing (score: 1)
Author: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:09:31 -0400
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 06/27/2007 04:08:20 PM: 10% rman. We just had this conversation with out local IBM folks. We were told you can purchase licenses based
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2007-06/msg00510.html (13,853 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu