David, No, the fsck / delete actions aren't mentioned in the log. In the log I can only see: full|incr backup started for share xxxxx full|incr backup NNN complete, xxxxxx files, yyyyy bytes Perhaps
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard AT eircom DOT net> wrote: What exactly is the dilemma? Time! I do not has it! Actually, I'm not sure if Sernet has released compatible AD Sa
Author: David Cramblett <david AT functionalchaos DOT net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 15:04:03 -0700
Yes, your right. It does appear that it's running the fsck on every exisiting backup for the given host. David On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Jimmy <mupperoni AT gmail DOT com> wrote: David, No, th
Author: Richard Zimmerman <rzimmerman AT riverbendhose DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 12:54:03 +0000
Do you actually have selinux in enforcing mode? If so, I would have thought it would be sensible to turn it to permissive, until the BackupPC problem is solved. I'm reasonably certain if you applied
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:45:36 -0500
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard AT eircom DOT net> wrote: I think it is the difference between Apache 2.2 and 2.4. The apache log said the configuration prevented the client
Author: Bob of Donelson Trophy <bob AT donelsontrophy DOT net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:06:40 -0500
Les, What I was trying to say (and not very well) is that I was having trouble finding the answers I needed. I had to get the backup server up and running so I abandon the C7 version and reverted to
615.885.2846 Donelson Trophy www.donelsontrophy.com "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-09-22 13:45, Les Mikesell wrote: On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard AT eircom DOT net
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:30:34 -0500
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Brad Alexander <storm16 AT gmail DOT com> wrote: I didn't mean there was a problem running 2.4, just that if you put 'Require Local' which I believe was in the other
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:26:40 +0200
Hi, Les Mikesell wrote on 2015-09-22 14:30:34 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.]: or, more to the point, it seems to be a bug in the
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:49:41 +0200
Hi, Stefan Peter wrote on 2015-09-21 20:20:44 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.]: [this is worth resending] Are you asking for our he
Author: Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:08:45 +0200
Hi, tdevoye wrote on 2015-09-16 05:16:34 -0700 [[BackupPC-users] Can`t Change {TopDir} Location . .]: you probably mean 'service backuppc restart' ... This message is not from any init script distrib
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:22:34 -0500
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Holger Parplies <wbppc AT parplies DOT de> wrote: I think the stock package does limit to local clients on both 2.2 and 2.4 by default, but the syntax is different an
Author: Timothy Murphy <gayleard AT eircom DOT net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:48:11 +0100
I don't understand why there is the double restriction Allow from and Require in /etc/httpd/conf.d/BackupPC.conf Both seem to me to have much the same effect. -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.n
Author: Bob of Donelson Trophy <bob AT donelsontrophy DOT net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 21:10:08 -0500
First, I have trimmed out the irrelevant rhetoric. To the nicer people on this list, with your help, I have moved on. If you read all the threads of my original post, Stefan Peter was the first to ge
Author: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:15:01 -0500
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard AT eircom DOT net> wrote: The comments in the chunk as posted made it pretty clear that one part was for Apache 2.2 and one for 2.4. <IfModul
Author: Timothy Murphy <gayleard AT eircom DOT net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:59:34 +0100
Apologies - I found my /etc/httpd/conf.d/BackupPC.conf was a mixture or past and present. I guess I would still wonder why there has been this change from the classical "allow from" to "Require ...",
Author: Timothy Murphy <gayleard AT eircom DOT net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:02:14 +0100
When I browse to <server>/backuppc and login I get the warning -- Error: Unable to connect to BackupPC server This CGI script (/backuppc) is unable to connect to the BackupPC server on localhost port
Author: Christian Völker <chrischan AT knebb DOT de>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:48:43 +0200
Hi guys, I am using BackupPC now for years and it was always running perfectly. Around 25 hosts; /var/lib/BackupPC is around 2TB). Currently I am having an issue with one of my remote hosts. I even c
Hi Chris, How much is the downlink? (rsync needs a good deal of bi-dir exchanges) Make sure you only use one compression order in any place (either backuppc or openvpn, NOT both). And as you have a f
Author: Christian Völker <chrischan AT knebb DOT de>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:41:31 +0200
Hi, 25Mbit/s. The connection is for sure not the limiting factor. Uplinks is used for ~350Kb/s while the downlink even uses less during the "backup". How should this do any harm? The router is a tota