|
Re: [nv-l] ITSA port manage question
2005-11-18 11:17:12
Hi Becki,
I think this was probably my original post and it was about ITSA 1.3.
There was no Port Status Monitoring prior to that.
Since then, I have written a document with various scenarios around ITSA
1.3, especially looking at these parameters. You can pick it up from
the NetView TUG site at http://www.nv-l.org/twiki/bin/view/Netview/ItSa
Cheers,
Jane
Kain, Becki (B.) wrote:
There was a post on July 7th about switch analyzer where the answer was:
poll_all_ports=n
Use this only if you want to optimize polling - it has no effect on what
ports are being managed. All ports are managed - those not covered by
the passive method will be actively polled - it simply removes the
overlap.
Is this still the case in 1.3 - that if we enroll a switch, all ports
are managed? We have a request to have only the uplinks of switch
monitored, not all the unnumbered ports.
Thanks in advance.
Becki Kain
--
Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
Copyright (c) 2005 Jane Curry <jane.curry AT skills-1st.co DOT uk>. All rights
reserved.
|
|
|
