[nv-l] failure notice

----- Forwarded by Christopher J Petrina/Corporate/Mead on 03/16/2004 04:37 PM -----

MAILER-DAEMON AT messagelabs DOT com

03/16/2004 04:36 PM

To: cjp8 AT meadwestvaco DOT com
cc:
Subject: failure notice

Hello all,

have a question:

Q1: can anyone explain how netview is/or is not able to differentiate
between summary routes and specific routes?
meaning I have devices listed as such

170.85.241.64 with mask of 170.85.0.0
but there is also a network called 170.85.224.0 with mask of 255.255.224.0

how does Netview differentiate the two and which mask would it use?

thanks
Chris Petrina

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service._______________________________________________________________

Note: Please update your email address for this user to reflect MeadWestvaco Corporation. MeadWestvaco employee email addresses
are in the format of user AT MeadWestvaco DOT com

This electronic message contains information from MeadWestvaco
Corporation or subsidiary companies, which may be confidential,
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The
information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s)
named. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that
any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
transmission or its contents is prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify MeadWestvaco
immediately at postmaster AT MeadWestvaco DOT com.
_______________________________________________________________________
--=_alternative 0076ABF385256E59_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

 Hello all,
 
 have a question:
 
 Q1:   can anyone explain how netview is/or is not able to differentiate between summary routes and specific routes?
 meaning I have devices listed as such
 
 170.85.241.64 with mask of 170.85.0.0
 but there is also a network called 170.85.224.0 with mask of 255.255.224.0
 
 how does Netview differentiate the two and which mask would it use?
 
 thanks
 Chris Petrina
 

--=_alternative 0076ABF385256E59_=--

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service._______________________________________________________________