RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces

Subject:	RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces
From:	"Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8 AT meadwestvaco DOT com>
To:	nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com
Date:	Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:55:48 -0500

If all my devices are SNMP enabled and capable what would be the reason to ever bother with PING'ing these devices vs. always SNMP polling them.
And is SNMP polling a more robust ( most reliable) method for devising if a device is trully "up" or not?

-Chris Petrina

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Barr, Scott RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, James Shanks [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Klingensmith, Debra L. RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Barr, Scott RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Klingensmith, Debra L. RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Christopher J Petrina <= RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Stephen Hochstetler RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Barr, Scott RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, James Shanks

Previous by Date:	RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Klingensmith, Debra L.
Next by Date:	RE: [nv-l] Newbie Question - Auto Map re-gen and Net MON, John Sobrinho
Previous by Thread:	RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Klingensmith, Debra L.
Next by Thread:	RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces, Stephen Hochstetler
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]