nv-l

Re: [nv-l] Maximum number of interfaces per router

2003-11-04 08:56:36
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Maximum number of interfaces per router
From: Paul Stroud <pstroud AT bellsouth DOT net>
To: nv-l AT lists.us.ibm DOT com, "Pritesh Jewan" <Pritesh AT aptronics.co DOT za>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:46:09 -0500
There is no limitation for number of interfaces in Linux/UNIX.

Paul



On Tuesday 04 November 2003 08:14, Pritesh Jewan wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I am trying to determine the maximum number of interfaces per a router
> that Netview can discover and manage. I found an article on the IBM
> support site that states that Netview on NT and 2000 support a maximum
> of 256 interfaces per router.
>
> Is this the same for Unix/Linux ? I have a customer that wants to
> install NetView 7.1.4 on Redhat Advanced Server 2.1 and will be managing
> a Cisco 7200 series router with 400 interfaces. Has anyone run into
> problems managing routers with large number of interfaces ?
>
> Thank You
> Pritesh
>
> Pritesh Jewan
> Aptronics (Pty) Ltd
> Tel   : +27 (0) 11 577 0800
> Fax  : +27 (0) 11 326 4921
> Cell : +27 (0) 84-677-2486
> pritesh AT aptronics.co DOT za
> *** Aptronics...Has Moved !
> Please take note of new address and contact details.
>
> Physical Address :
> Aptronics House, 288 Main avenue
> Cnr. Main and Harley
> Ferndale, 2194
>
> Postal Address:
> P.O. Box 2732, Randburg, 2125
>
> Telephone : (011) 577-0800
> Facsimile : (011) 326-4921
>
>
> Legal Disclaimer: This E-mail, it's attachment/s and the information
> that it contains is/are confidential, legally privileged and protected
> by law. Access to this E-mail, it's attachment/s, and the information it
> contains is/are for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
> recipient of this Email , do not read, disclose, disseminate or use the
> information in any way.
>
> Any views in this communication are those of the sender except where the
> sender specifically states them to be the views of Aptronics (PTY) Ltd.
> Aptronics (PTY) Ltd and the sender does not represent, warrant and/or
> guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained
> nor that the communication is free of errors or virus nor does it
> guarantee that it has not been intercepted or interfered with en-route.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>