|
RE: [nv-l] Correlation question
2003-05-20 15:30:41
|
Jim,
I'm unclear from
your post whether you are attempting correlation at layer 2 (use of term
segment) or layer 3 (represented by X.Y.Z network number). Others have
already suggested third party products for layer 2 correlation. Netview
has some layer 3 correlation via the Router Fault Isolation
feature. If you're not already familiar, refer to document
/usr/OV/doc/RouterFaultIsolation.htm
Regards,
Karin
Binder
-----Original
Message-----
From: JamesHorwath AT glic DOT com
[mailto:JamesHorwath AT glic DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 7:43
AM
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Subject: [nv-l] Correlation
question
Hi folks,
I am somewhat of a newbie running NetView, I have used
other network management products in the past. I am running V7R1 on AIX
4.3. I am using NetView to monitor segments, routers, switches and Unix
Nodes. I am attempting to setup a correlation rule which will prevent a
page going out for every node on a segment if the segment goes belly-up.
Can I create one rule per segment and apply said rule to every node on
the segment? Or do I need to create and apply a correlation individually
to each node on the segment. Here is what I want to avoid. If
segment X.Y.Z is unavailable I do not want 50 pages sent to staff, one for
each node on X.Y.Z saying the node in unavailable. I am looking at
Section 5 of the Administrators guide. Is there a place with a clear
example of what I am trying to do? I mustn't be the first guy trying to
do this. I have searched the web and didn't find an exam! ple.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jim
Jim Horwath
Guardian
IT Unix
Services
610-807-8795
|
|
|
