nv-l

RE: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?

2001-10-18 15:10:46
Subject: RE: sending trap as TEC event w/o using ruleset--example?
From: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:10:46 -0500
Be aware that using multiple rulesets has a down side as well. First, if you
use any kind of query or trap settings node, you incur multiple queries each
time the next ruleset is started. use 4 rulesets, you will do 4 queries
where as with one ruleset and a single trap setting or query node, you would
only do one database query. This is a pretty big CPU hit if you are using a
lot of smartsets.

-----Original Message-----
From: netview AT toddh DOT net [mailto:netview AT toddh DOT net]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:54 PM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: Re: [NV-L] sending trap as TEC event w/o using
ruleset--example?


"Stephen Hochstetler" <shochste AT us.ibm DOT com> writes:
> You can easily run multiple rulesets.
> 
> You can create a very small ruleset using Leslie's great idea and activate
> it using the "TEC Adapter".

This sounds appealing...but how does this "small ruleset" get the
output from the multiple other rulesets?  Or is there some
functionality of the ruleset editor that I'm missing?  

All I'm aware of it the File>Import function in the ruleste editor
that place a copy of a ruleset into an existing one...resulting in a
rather large ruleset. 

> You can create additional rulesets  and activate all of them (multiple) in
> the /usr/OV/conf/ESE.automation file.   This should let you group rules
> within a ruleset so that you can manage them easier.


-- 
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/