nv-l

RE: New device on Netview

2001-08-28 13:23:34
Subject: RE: New device on Netview
From: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:23:34 -0500
What is probably happening is that a config poll is going to a router (daily
config polls are on a 24 hour timer). When the arp cache is received, there
must be a new device in it that matches discovery seed file settings.
Devices in the router arp cache I would assume are added only when they meet
the discovery criteria unless new node discovery is turned on. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Les Dickert [mailto:lesdickert AT hotmail DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:03 PM
To: nv-l AT tkg DOT com
Subject: RE: [NV-L] New device on Netview


I get things discovered in the wee hours
of the night too.  I don't know, but it
wouldn't surprise me to find that NetView
gauges how much (if any) discovery to do
depending on the speed of status ping responses.
That is, if they are slow, don't do discovery cause
things are busy.  If they are fast (during the
night), do discovery cause things are
idle.

Les Dickert
Verisign Consulting



>From: "CATALINA MARTINEZ" <CATALINA.MARTINEZ AT tlc.state.tx DOT us>
>Reply-To: IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>
>To: <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>
>Subject: RE: [NV-L] New device on Netview
>Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:17:19 -0500
>
>Scott,
>
>I failed to mentioned that I do have DISCOVER turned ON. I did not run 
>netmon-y to refresh. Another question:
>
>Now that those devices are discovered, Netview is displaying NodeDown. I 
>put a sniffer on Netview server to capture all traffic and it shows that 
>Netview is issuing 3 pings within the same second and not waiting for a 
>reply. So I get
>1)Interface down, node down, interface up, node up,2) interface down, node 
>down, interface up, node up 3)interface down, node down, interface up, node

>up
>
>I checked the /etc/host file and this device is not listed. Could it 
>possible that Netmon is confused when trying to resolve the name. The 
>netsvc.conf has hosts=local,bind. So it should look at the host file first 
>and then the dns server.
>
>Any ideas
>
> >>> Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com 08/28/01 08:03AM >>>
>
>If "new node discovery" is off you will not discover this device unless it 
>is in the seed file. If it is in the seed file, you can do a NETMON -Y to 
>refresh the netmon daemon and re-read the seed file. Or run discovery full 
>time.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: CATALINA MARTINEZ [mailto:CATALINA.MARTINEZ AT tlc.state.tx DOT us]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:43 AM
>To: nv-l AT tkg DOT com
>Subject: [NV-L] New device on Netview
>
>
>HI All,
>
>Running AIX 4.3.3 Netview 6.0.2 Framework 3.7.1
>
>General question, I added a new switch to the network yesterday morning 
>around 10am.The netmon added/discovered it around 4am this morning. Is that

>normal?
>
>All day yesterday, I pinged the device, I did a demand poll on the router 
>to see if Netmon would discover it sooner. I checked netmon.seed file to 
>make sure it was not excluded. I also looked at netmon's queue but nothing 
>was 'waiting' .
>
>any ideas as to why it took so long to discover a device? or is this 
>normal?
>
>Please advice.


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>