My guess would be that the second system, on whose map you say
that subnet is unmanaged, has at least one other map and that subnet
is managed on at least one of them. The extra traffic on the subnet
caused by the first system's rediscovery is causing delayed response
to the status polls of the second system.

To check for multiple maps on the second system, do File...Open  and
see what maps are listed. If there is only the 'default' map, then I, too,
am mystified.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit


fjliu AT CA.IBM DOT [email protected] on 10/06/2000 11:50:39 AM

Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l AT tkg DOT com>

Sent by:  owner-nv-l AT tkg DOT com


To:   nv-l AT tkg DOT com
cc:
Subject:  [NV-L] discovery events





I have two netview servers in diffierent subnetwork, they are supposed to
work independently.  When I do automatic map generation on one netview,
another netview server also get a lot node down events from the subnet
which is unmanged by him. Does anybody know how it happened?

thanks & Best regards,

Frank Liu
Systems Management & Networking Services, IGS
Tele: (905)316-3754     Fax: (905)315-2535
email:  fjliu AT ca.ibm DOT com


_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l