nv-l

Re: noniptopology

2000-02-02 12:30:09
Subject: Re: noniptopology
From: James Shanks <James_Shanks AT TIVOLI DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:30:09 -0500
The Programmer's Guide itself has examples of these traps, doesn't it?  They
appear under "Using the Trap Interface", "Trap Interface Example"  later in the
book.

I myself am not a user of nonipotopology so I cannot advise you on how to use
these traps to build an application. And keep in mind that these APIs were
specifically developed for  professional  or talented application developers who
did have a compiler. There is a sample application discussed in the IBM redbook,
"Examples of Using NetView for AIX", GG24-4327-00, in a section on Open
Topology.  This book is written for NetView Version 3, but that API has not
changed.   They also have some sample programs that will require compilation,
and after you read what they do,  you may decide to get a compiler.

   You can see this book at  http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/

Perhaps if you describe again in detail what you are trying to do, other users
may be able to help.  All I remember is that you wanted to know why the 58916871
status trap did not affect object status in the object database.

James Shanks
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support



Alejandro Mechoulam <amechoul AT BMA.COM DOT AR> on 02/02/2000 11:56:14 AM

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
      <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
Subject:  noniptopology




James, I was reading the Programmers guide and found I can create and
manage object usning snmptrap (remember I hava not a C compiler). But could
not find nothing but two examples about the information passed to.
Please if someone knows about a paper describing the traps please let me
know.
The traps are: 1879048216, 1879048206, 1879048222, 1879048213 and in the
trap configuration file there ara more.
Thanks.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>