nv-l

Re: Ciscoworks and Netview for NT

1999-12-02 11:06:06
Subject: Re: Ciscoworks and Netview for NT
From: Scott Hammons <SHammons AT MCBRIDE DOT COM>
To: nv-l AT lists.tivoli DOT com
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:06:06 -0700
My question would be then that both Cisco and Tivoli have stated that CW2000
is Tivoli Ready.  Is this not the case since you had to write your own
scripts for integration.  How are you doing your integration if you don't
mind me asking?

Scott Hammons
McBride and Associates, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: Edvyn.Lek AT BANKOFAMERICA DOT COM [mailto:Edvyn.Lek AT BANKOFAMERICA DOT 
COM]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 8:53 AM
To: NV-L AT UCSBVM.ucsb DOT edu
Subject: Re: Ciscoworks and Netview for NT


Cw2k is a standlone application, a resource hog not designed from a
performance
optimization perspective as yet, and lack crucial functionalities. For the
most
part, cw2k has the potential to be a great product, if we continue to pursue
this with Cisco.We have an implementation, where we have Netview on AIX and
cw2k
on Solaris. We wrote some scripts in-house to integrate between these two
applications.






"Dearman, Richard" <rdearm1 AT UIC DOT EDU> on 12/02/99 07:23:27 AM

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView
      <NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU>

To:   NV-L AT UCSBVM.UCSB DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Edvyn Lek)
Subject:  Ciscoworks and Netview for NT



Does the 5.1.2 release of Netview allow for intergration with
Ciscoworks2000.  Or does anyone know when that integration capablity will be
available for Netview for NT.